期刊文献+

论话语标记的连接性——以广义语境的视角 被引量:2

On Connectivity of Discourse Markers——From a Perspective of Context in a Wider Sense
下载PDF
导出
摘要 话语标记的连接性是话语标记的重要特征之一,但目前对话语标记的连接性存在两种观点:以Schiffrin等为代表的连贯派认为,话语标记的连接性体现在对同一话语中不同的话语语句(片段)的连接上,而以Blakemore等为代表的关联派学者却认为话语标记的连接性不是对不同话语语句的连接,而是一种推理连接。作者在论述这两种观点的基础上,以更广义的语境视角来探讨话语标记的连接性,从而更加全面地论述话语标记的连接性,也能更好地研究话语标记的作用。 Connectivity is generally deemed as one of the most important attributes of discourse markers. However, till now two seemingly different ideas are prevalent concerning connectivity of discourse markers : one is represented b.y Sehiffrin that connectivity of discourse markers exhibits the connection of different discourse utterances ( segments), but the other is represented by Blakemore that connectivity of discourse markers should not be restricted to connectivity of different discourse utterances but inferential connectivity. On the basis of these two ideas, the paper further explores connectivity of discourse markers from a perspective of context in a wider sense, so that connectivity of discourse markers will be more comprehensively studied and their functions will be more completely explored as well.
作者 陈家晃 阳勇
出处 《集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2011年第4期99-104,共6页 Journal of Jimei University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基金 四川省教育厅青年基金项目(10SB048)
关键词 话语标记 连接性 连贯 关联 语境 discourse markers connectivity coherence relevance context
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1FRASER B. What are discourse markers? [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1999 (31) : 931 -952.
  • 2SCHOURUP B. Discourse Markers [J]. Lingua, 1999 (107) : 227 -265.
  • 3HANSEN M -B M. Alors and donc in spoken French: A reanalysis [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1997 (28) : 153 - 187.
  • 4SCHIFFRIN D. Discourse Markers [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  • 5MANN W, S THOMPSON. Relational propositions in discourse [J]. Discourse Processes, 1986 (9): 57-90.
  • 6REDEKER G. Linguistic markers of discourse structure [J]. Linguistics, 1991 (29) : 1139-1172.
  • 7FRASER B. Pragmatic markers [ J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1996 (6): 167-190.
  • 8BLAKEMORE D. Semantic constraints on relevance [M]. Oxford : Blackwell, 1987.
  • 9SPERBER D , D WILSON. Relevance: Communication and cognition [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
  • 10BLAKEMORE D. Are apposition markers discourse markers [ J ]. Journal of Linguistics, 1996 ( 32 ) : 325 - 347.

二级参考文献12

共引文献22

同被引文献31

  • 1许家金.话语标记的现场即席观[J].外语学刊,2009(2):83-87. 被引量:23
  • 2Cuenca,M.J. Pragmatic markers in contrast:The case ofwell[J].Journal of Pragmatics 2008,(40):1373-1391.
  • 3Norrick,N. Discourse markers in oral narrative [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2001 (33):849-878.
  • 4Richards, J.C.R. Schmid, Language teaching & ap- plied linguistics [C]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2003.
  • 5HaUiday, M.A.K. and R.Hansan, Cohesion in Eng- lish [M]. London: Longman, 1976.
  • 6Schiffrin, D. Discourse Markers [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  • 7Verschueren, J. Understanding Pragmatics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000.
  • 8Schiffrin, D. Conversational coherencce: The role of well [J]. Language 1985(61):640-667.
  • 9Fuller, M.J. The influence of speaker roles on dis- course marker use [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2003(35):23- 45.
  • 10Jucker, A.H. The discourse marker well: A releve- vance-theoretical account [J]. Journal of Pragmatics,1993 (9):435-452.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部