1Raes A. M. L., M. G. Heijltjes, U. Glunk, and R. A. Roe, The Interface of the top management team and middle managers: A process model, Academy of Management Review, 2011, Vol.36, No. 1, pp. 102-126.
4Hambfick D C, Msaon P A. Upper echelom; The or- ganization as a reflection d its top managers [ J]. Academy af- Management Re-view, 1984, (9): 193-206.
5Miller, D., & Droge, C. Psychological and traditional detemainants of structure [ J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1986, 31:539 - 560.
6Knight, D., Pearee, C.L., Smith, K.G. & Olian, J.D., Top management team divemity, group process, and strategic consensus [ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20 (5): 445-465.
7Mason A.Carpnter, Marta A.Geletkanyczl, Wm. Gerard Sanders. Upper Echdom Research Revisited: An- tecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition [ J ]. Journal of Management, 2004, 30 (6): 749 -778.
8West G P. Collective Cognition: When Entrepreneurial Teams, Not Individuals, Make Decisions [ J]. Entrepreneur- ship: Theory & Practice, 2007, 31 (1) : 77 - 102.
9Hambfick D C. Upper echelons theory: An update [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, (32): 334-343.
10Cannella A A, Park J, Lee H. Top Management Team Functional Baclqgound Diversity And Firm Performance: Examing The Roles Of Team Member Colocation And Enviromnen- tal Uncertainty [ J ]. Aeademy 51 (4) : 768 - 784.
