期刊文献+

基于跨部门信息的道路交通安全设施效果评价方法研究 被引量:7

Research on Effect Evaluation Method of Road Safety Measures Facilities
原文传递
导出
摘要 在对各类道路安全设施进行详细分析的基础上,比较全面、系统地构建了道路安全设施系统效果评价指标体系,并对各指标的含义及计算方法进行了研究。考虑到道路交通安全设施效果难以直接表征的特点,基于交通安全设施评价值,综合考虑评价路段的事故数和交通违法数,得出道路交通安全设施效果综合评价值。最后,根据综合评价值的效果显著程度确定道路交通安全设施效果。 The road traffic safety facilities are an important part of highway.They are the most necessary facilities to play the normal function of road,satisfy the highway traffic demand,and guarantee the most basic of road traffic safety.Therefore the road traffic safety facilities whether security or not is very important.Based on the detailed analysis and comparison for all kinds of road safety facilities,the road safety facilities' evaluation index system is constructed,and the meaning of each index and the method is defined.Considering the difficult of the effect of road traffic safety facilities to direct the characterization,based on traffic safety facilities evaluation value,the number of accidents and violations are comprehensively considered,and then the comprehensive evaluation value of the road traffic safety facilities is calculated.Finally,the road traffic safety facilities effects are determined according to the signification of the comprehensive evaluation value's effect.
出处 《公路》 北大核心 2011年第10期145-150,共6页 Highway
基金 交通安全信息集成 分析及平台构建技术开发与示范应用 项目编号2009BAG13A01
关键词 道路交通安全设施 效果评价 评价方法 指标体系 road traffic safety facilities performance evaluation evaluation method index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献9

  • 1刘万里,雷治军.关于AHP中判断矩阵校正方法的研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,17(6):30-34. 被引量:110
  • 2Saaty T L. Concepts, theory and techniques; rank generation, preservation and reversal in AHP[J]. Decision Sciences, 1987,18(1):157- 177.
  • 3Saaty T L. Decision making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003,145 (1):85 - 91.
  • 4Bryan N, Mobolurin A. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1995,96(2):379 - 386.
  • 5Saaty T L, Vargas L G.Inconsistency and rank preservation[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1984,28(2):205 - 214.
  • 6Crawford G, William C A. A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1985,29(5) :387 - 405.
  • 7Tam C Y, Tummala V M. An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system [J].International Journal of Management Science, 2001, 29(2) : 171 - 182.
  • 8李梅霞.AHP中判断矩阵一致性改进的一种新方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2000,20(2):122-125. 被引量:139
  • 9金菊良,魏一鸣,潘金锋.修正AHP中判断矩阵一致性的加速遗传算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(1):63-69. 被引量:61

共引文献55

同被引文献35

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部