期刊文献+

核桃亲子鉴定方法的建立 被引量:9

Establishment of Walnut Paternity Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】针对核桃育种中父本不清、亲本混淆问题,建立简便快捷高效的核桃亲本鉴定方法,也为其它林木和果树品种亲本鉴定提供参考。【方法】以‘鲁果2号’为鉴定材料,采用表型性状和SSR标记的方法对‘鲁果2号’及其可能的亲本进行亲子分析。【结果】表型性状方法统计的8对坚果性状在各品种间差异很小,不能鉴定出子代亲本;SSR分型检测出疑似亲本中只有‘上宋6号’和‘鲁香’与子代‘鲁果2号’的等位基因遗传符合孟德尔遗传规律,其累积RCP(亲子关系概率)为99.997%,‘slz-40’与已知亲本鉴定结果与实际相符。【结论】‘上宋6号’和‘鲁香’是‘鲁果2号’的亲本,SSR分型技术较好地鉴别出了‘鲁果2号’的亲本,为其它林木和果树品种寻找和鉴别亲本,提供有效手段。 【Objective】A simple,rapid and efficient walnut paternity method was established to resolve the problems of unknown paternal and confused parents in breeding,which provided reference for other varieties.【Method】'Luguo-2' was used as material.Phenotypic traits and SSR markers were conducted to analyse parentage relationship between 'Luguo-2' and its alleged parents.【Result】The phenotypes with statistics of eight nut stable expressional characters failed to get parent-child correlation results.In genotype results,the heredity of 'Shangsong-6','Luxiang' and 'Luguo-2' accords with Mendelian genetic regularity,there may be a paternity.PI and RCP wre analyzed by using the results of 10 SSR primer pairs,and the cumulative RCP was 99.997%.In addition,the appraisal result between 'Slz-40' and its known parent was consistent with the reality.【Conclusion】'Shangsong-6' and 'Luxiang' were the parents of 'Luguo-2' with SSR clustering results supporting the conclusion.The parents of 'Luguo-2' were identified by SSR genotypes and thus providing an effective method to search and identify the parents of other trees and fruit varieties.
出处 《中国农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第20期4258-4264,共7页 Scientia Agricultura Sinica
基金 国家林业公益性行业科研专项经费项目:核桃集约及可持续生产关键技术研究(201004048) 国家林业局重点项目(2008-04)
关键词 核桃 表型性状 SSR 亲权指数 亲子鉴定 walnut phenotypes SSR PI paternity test
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1沈德绪1995.果树育种学.北京:中国农业出版社.
  • 2Riemenschneider D E, Stanton B J, Vallee G, Perine P. Poplar breeding Strategies//Poplar Culture in North America. NRC Research Press, 2001: 43-76.
  • 3张美勇,徐颖,刘嘉芬,许林.核桃新品种鲁果2号的选育研究[J].中国果树,2008(6):3-6. 被引量:7
  • 4Bautista J, Dangl G S, Yang J, Reisch B, Stover E. Use of genetic markers to assess pedigrees of grape cultivars and breeding program selections. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2008, 59(3): 248-254.
  • 5Chakrabarty D, Gupta V N, Datta S K. Varietal identification and assessment of genetic relationships in hippeastrum using RAPD markers. Plant Biotechnology Reports, 2007, 1(4): 211-217.
  • 6Martos V, Royo C, Rharrabti Y, Garcia del Moral L F. Using AFLP to determine phylogenetic relationships and genetic erosion in durum wheat cultivars released in Italy and Spain throughout the 20th century. Field Crops Research, 2005, 91(1): 107-116.
  • 7Wei H, Fu Y, Arora R. Utilization of intron-flanking EST-specific markers in the phylogenetic analysis and parentage identification of Rhododendron species and hybrids. Journal of The American Society for Horticultural Science, 2006, 131(6): 814-819.
  • 8Sawamura Y, Takada N, Yamamoto T, Saito T, Kimura T, Kotobuki K. Identification of parent-offspring relationships in 55 Japanese pear cultivars using S-RNase allele and SSR markers. Journal of The Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 2008, 77(4): 364-373.
  • 9Montemurro C, Simeone R, Pasqulaone A, Ferrara E, Blanco A. Genetic relationships and cultivar identification among 112 olive accessions using AFLP and SSR markers. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 2005, 80(1): 105-110.
  • 10Kimura T, Sawamura Y, Kotobuki K, Matsuta N, Hayashi T, Ban Y, Yamamoto T. Parentage analysis in pear cultivars characterized by SSR markers. Journal of The Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 2003, 72(3): 182-189.

二级参考文献65

共引文献115

同被引文献161

引证文献9

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部