期刊文献+

非融合棘突间固定器不同棘突间撑开高度对植入节段椎间盘压力分布的影响 被引量:4

Effects of a new shape-memory alloy interspinous process device on the pressure distribution of implanted intervertebral disc segment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:腰椎退变性疾病目前的非融合内固定特别是棘突间固定理论上可以保留有益活动,在缓解疼痛的同时预防邻近节段退变。目的:测量棘突间不同的撑开程度情况下节段椎间盘负荷分担及应力分布情况。方法:新鲜成人腰椎标本L2~5,采用电子万能实验机模拟腰椎前屈、中立、后伸运动负荷。实验分为7组:正常脊柱组,形状记忆合金棘突间固定器支撑高度10,12,14,16,18,20mm组。结果与结论:支撑高度为10mm的形状记忆合金棘突间固定器对植入节段椎间盘的压力分布无显著性影响;支撑高度为12mm的形状记忆合金棘突间固定器在过伸时可分担46%的椎间盘后纤维环负荷(P<0.05);支撑高度为14mm的形状记忆合金棘突间固定器可维持植入节段的轻度前屈,在过伸时可分担约47%的后环负荷(P<0.05),但后伸时会增大前环的负荷,当支撑高度远大于植入节段中立位时的棘突间高度时,屈伸活动时,后环的负荷显著降低的同时,前环负荷可增大达400%。提示支撑高度等于或略大于中立位棘突间高度的非融合棘突间固定器可分担椎间盘负荷并使椎间盘应力更均匀分布;但支撑高度过大会明显增大前环的负荷,如果用于神经源性间歇性跛行患者的椎间孔撑开,可能会加快椎间盘的退变。 BACKGROUND:The degeneration of the intervertebral disc and zygapophyseal joints(facet joint) is the main cause of degenerative lumbar stenosis with the clinical outcomes including chronic low back pain and neurogenic intermittent claudication.Dynamic stabilization devices,especially non-fusion interspinous process stabilization devices(IPD),are noteworthy in saving segmental movement,showing faster recovery and rehabilitation without increasing the degeneration of adjacent segments.OBJECTIVE:To compare and quantify the disc pressure to understand the likelihood of accelerated disc degeneration in the implanted level to optimize the usage of the implant.METHODS:Six cadaver lumbar specimens(L2-5) were loaded in flexion,neutral,and extension.A pressure measuring film measured the disc load during each of the three positions at each L3-4 disc level.The implant with different spacer height including 10 mm,12 mm,14 mm,16 mm,18 mm,20 mm was placed at L3-L4 by turns,and the pressure measurements were repeated.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The IPD with 10 mm spacer height could not significantly share the disc load.The 12 mm implant significant shared posterior annulus load only in extension.The 14 mm implant decreased the stress in posterior annulus and nucleus in extension and neutral but slightly increased the anterior annulus load.Though the 16 mm-20 mm implants decreased the posterior annulus' stress significantly,the anterior annulus load was increased about 400% in aforementioned three positions.Different distraction degrees of interspinous process may lead to different disc load distribution,the implant would be not appropriate to those serious spinal stenosis because of the contradictions that though the over distraction can decrease the posterior annulus load and distract the intervertebral foramina,it will lead to an acceleration of disc degeneration by the excessive load increasing in anterior annulus.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第39期7279-7283,共5页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Swanson KE,Lindsey DP,Hsu KY,et al.The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures.Spine.2003; 28:26-32.
  • 2DK Sengupta.Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain Neurology India.2005;4:466-4.
  • 3Arnoldi CC,Brodsky AE,Cauchoix J,et al.Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes:Definition and classification.Clin Orthop.1976;115:4-5.
  • 4Inufusa A,An HS,Lim TH,et al.Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion--extension movement.Spine.1996;21:2412-2420.
  • 5Katz JN,Lipson SJ,Larson MG,et al.The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis.J Bone Joint Surg[Am].1991;73:809-816.
  • 6Chung SS,Lee CS,Kim SH,et al.Effect of low back posture on the morphology of the spinal canal.Skeletal Radiol.2000;29:217-223.
  • 7Giles LG.Mechanisms of neurovascular compression within the spinal and intervertebral canals.Manipulative Physiol Ther.2000; 23:107-111.
  • 8Hawkes CH,Roberts GM.Neurogenic and vascular claudication.Neurol Sci 1978;38:337-345.
  • 9Hilibrand AS,Rand N.Degenerative lumbar stenosis:Diagnosis and management.Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999;7:239-249.
  • 10Boos N,Webb JK.Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders:a European view.Eur Spine J.1997;6:2-18.

同被引文献68

  • 1刘志顺,赵宏,谢利民,叶永铭,魏成军,孙书臣,张维,刘元石,马晓晶.针刺治疗继发性退变性腰椎管狭窄间歇性跛行疗效评价[J].中国针灸,2004,24(7):461-464. 被引量:13
  • 2郭祥,张寿,周业渊,张小明,邢势.椎板及后韧带复合结构瓣回植治疗老年性腰椎管狭窄症[J].海南医学,2005,16(3):35-36. 被引量:8
  • 3田慧中,王以进,李永年.后部结构切除对腰椎稳定性影响的实验研究[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,14(9):557-560. 被引量:158
  • 4汤华丰,柴本甫,沈才伟,孙争鸣.腰椎管成形术治疗腰椎管狭窄的临床观察(附22例临床报告)[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(4):238-239. 被引量:21
  • 5Fritz JM,Lurie JD,Zhao W,et al. Associations between physical therapy and long-term outcomes for individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis in the SPORT study[J]. Spine J,2013.PMID:24373681.
  • 6Takahashi J,Kobayashi H,Wakabayashi S,et al. The effect of a prostaglandin E1 derivative on the symptoms and quality of life of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. J Orthop Sci,2013,18(2): 208-215.
  • 7Podichetty VK,Segal AM ,Lieber M ,et al. Effectiveness of salmon calcitonin nasalspray in the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis:a double-blind,randomized ,placebo-controlled,parallel group trial[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2004,29(21) :2343-2349.
  • 8Kim HJ.Yeom JS.Lee JW,et al. The influence of pain sensitivity on the treatment outcome of tnmsforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Pain Pract,2014,14 (5): 405 -412.
  • 9Park CH,Lee SH. Correlation between severity of lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar epidural steroid injection[J]. Pain Med,2014,15 (4) :556-561.
  • 10Masini M ,Calaca A. Minimally invasive treatment for refractory low back pain,targeted by epidural endoscopy with O2/O3 and steroid therapy[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2011.108 : 33-37.

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部