摘要
目的:观察比较1064nm Q开关脉冲激光、1320nm激光治疗中度寻常性痤疮的疗效及安全性,探索安全、有效的痤疮治疗方法。方法:对三组痤疮患者分别进行1064nm Q开关脉冲激光、1320nm激光以及口服美满霉素治疗,疗程为28天。结果:1064nm治疗组150例,共统计125例,有效率89.6%;1320nm组150例,共统计142例,有效率87.3%;美满霉素组60例,共统计55例,总有效率为89.1%。经统计学分析,三组疗效差异无统计学意义,且激光治疗副作用小。结论:两种激光治疗痤疮安全有效。
Objective To compare the clinical effects and safety of intermediate acne vulgaris treated by the short-pulsed 1 064nm Nd：YAG laser and 1 320nm laser,for exploring a safety,efficacy physical method.Methods Give different treatments in 28 days to Three groups of Acne Patients,respectively with the short-pulsed 1 064nm Nd：YAG laser,1 320nm laser and minocycline per os.Results In the group of 125 patients with a short-pulsed 1 064 nm Nd：YAG laser,total effective rate was 89.6%;in the group of 142 patients with 1320nm laser,total effective rate was 87.3%;and in the group of 55 patients with minocycline per os,total effective rate was 89.1%.The difference has no statistics meaning.While the two groups treated by laser have less side-effect.Conclusions Two kind of laser therapeutic methods are safety and efficacy.
出处
《中国美容医学》
CAS
2011年第11期1766-1768,共3页
Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
