摘要
“米兰达规则”的确立 ,标志着西方国家的沉默权制度发展到“峰巅” ,但后来又出现了“回潮”。沉默权制度可以分为默示沉默权制度和明示沉默权制度 ,还可以分为审判沉默权制度和审讯沉默权制度。中国现在需要完善的是默示的审判沉默权制度 ,但是不应采用明示的审讯沉默权制度。一个国家对沉默权的态度 ,在一定程度上反映了其刑事司法的价值取向。
The doctrine of Miranda Warnings symbolized the “peak” of the development of the right in western countries, and then “downward” movement occurred. There are two forms of the right of silence, one is express right, the other is implied right, and it may be a right during interrogation or a right in trial. Now China should improve and perfect the system of the implied right of silence in trial, but not adopt the express right of silence during interrogation. The attitude of a country towards the right of silence reflects, to some degree, the adopted value of the criminal justice in the country.
出处
《上海政法学院学报（法治论丛）》
2000年第6期42-50,共9页
Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science & Law(The Rule of Law Forum)
关键词
沉默权
明示沉默权
默示沉默权
审讯沉默权
审判沉默权
刑事司法
right of silence
express right of silence
implied right of silence
right of silence during interrogation
right of silence in trial
criminal justi
