期刊文献+

莎士比亚戏剧再现之继承惯例研究

Representation of Inheritance Customs in Shakespeare's Comedies and Tragedies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 莎士比亚戏剧中,继承问题成为推动剧情发展的关键因素。继承问题既是当时政治与经济力量角力的体现,又是社会秩序变迁的反映。本文将从阶级与女性的维度审视莎剧情节中涉及的继承问题,研究其中再现的继承惯例与变化及由此折射出的政治与经济力量的变迁从而探讨格林布赖特的"颠覆与抑制"理论的适用性。。 In many of Shakespeare's plays, inheritance problems seem to have become one of the key forces prompting the plot development. Inheritance regulations on one hand reflect the social and political as well as economical power situation al that time, on the other hand promises the smooth transition of power and order. This article exams the representations of the inheritance regulations in Shakespeare's comedies and tragedies from the perspectives of class and gender, and explores the changes of inheritance regulations in relation to those of the social and economical power. Meanwhile, through the exploration of the changes of the inheritance regulations as represented in Shakespeare's plays, this article also aims at discussing the appropriateness of Stephen Greenblatt's theory of "Subversion and Containment".
作者 焦敏
出处 《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期99-103,共5页 Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
基金 广东省211三期重点学科建设"反思莎士比亚戏剧人文主义精神的普遍意义"(GDUFS211-1-059) 广东外语外贸大学校级项目(200801010006)"女性主义视角看莎剧中法律与人文精神的冲突"
关键词 莎士比亚 继承惯例 颠覆与抑制 Shakespeare inheritance customs subversion and containment
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Jordan, Constance and Cunningham, Karen. "English Law in shakespear&s plays", the law in shakespeare[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
  • 2Dollimore, Jonathan. "Shakespeare, cultural materialism and the new historicism", political shakespeare [M]. Ithaca London: Cornell University Press, 1994.
  • 3杨正润.文学的“颠覆”和“抑制”——新历史主义的文学功能论和意识形态论述评[J].外国文学评论,1994(3):20-29. 被引量:36
  • 4Thomas Starkey. A Dialogue between pole and lupset [M]. London Royal Historical Society, 1989.
  • 5Burke, Edmund. "Reflections on the French Revolution" [EB/OL]. http://www, bartlehy, com/24/3/, 2011- 10-05.
  • 6Faith, Rosamond J.. "Peasant Families and Inheritant Cus- toms in Medieval England"[J]. Agriculture History Reivew, 1966(xiv) ..77-95.
  • 7石坚,王欣.似是故人来——新历史主义视角下的20世纪英美文学[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2007.
  • 8沈文.英国土地制度史[M].北京:学林出版社,2005.
  • 9A. Macfar Lane. The Origins of English Individualism [M]. Basil Blackwell, 1978.
  • 10Morton, A. L.. A People's History of England [M]. Berlin: Lawrence Wishart, 1979.

二级参考文献11

  • 1杨正润.文学的“颠覆”和“抑制”——新历史主义的文学功能论和意识形态论述评[J].外国文学评论,1994(3):20-29. 被引量:36
  • 2赵静蓉.颠覆和抑制——论新历史主义的方法论意义[J].文艺评论,2002(1):13-16. 被引量:16
  • 3[1]Stephen Greenblatt.Shakespearean Negotiations[M].University of California Press,1988.
  • 4[2]M · Foucault.Language,Counter-Memory,Practice[M].Oxford,Basil Blackwell,1977.
  • 5[3]Harry · V · Jaffa."The Limits of Politics:An Interpretation of'King Lear',Act I,Scene 1"[J].In The American Political Science Review,Vol.LI,No.2,June,1957.
  • 6[5]Theodore Spencer."'Othello'and 'King Lear'"[M].In his Shakespeare and the Nature of Man,Macmillan Publishing Company,1942.
  • 7[6]Edwin Muir."The Politics of 'King Lear'"[M].In his Eassays on Literature and Society,Revised edition,Cambride,Mass,Harvard Univ-ersity Press,1965.
  • 8[12]H · Aram Veeser.The New Historicism[M].Routledge,1988.
  • 9[13]Theodre B.Leinwand."negotiation and New Historicism"[M].PMLA,May 1990.
  • 10[14]Jonathan Dollimore.Sexual Dissdengce[M].Clarendon Press,Oxford,1991.

共引文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部