期刊文献+

基于证据推理的武器装备体系能力需求满足度评估方法 被引量:49

A novel approach for WSoS capability requirement satisfactory degree evaluation using evidential reasoning
原文传递
导出
摘要 武器装备体系能力需求满足度评估中存在底层指标类型多样、评估信息不确定的问题.针对这一问题,提出了一种基于证据推理的满足度评估方法.该方法首先构造信度规则库,然后将多种类型的不确定性数据转换成统一的信度结构,最后通过证据推理方法获得能力需求满足度分布.文末,以陆上区域防空武器装备体系能力需求满足度评估为例说明该方法的运用和优点. Various types of low-level indexes and uncertainty of evaluation information exist in weapon system of systems (WSoS) capability requirement satisfactory evaluation. To solve this problem, a novel evaluation methodology using evidence reasoning is proposed. It firstly builds rule base with belief structure and transforms input information to a pre-defined form, then calculates the activation weight of input, after that using evidence reasoning for index aggregation to get the final assessment distribution. Area air-defense WSoS capability requirement satisfactory degree evaluation is investigated to illustrate the usage of the methodology and its advantages.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期2210-2216,共7页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70901074 70971131 71031007 71001104 71101096) 广东省自然科学基金(10451802904005327)
关键词 武器装备体系 能力需求满足度 证据推理 信度规则库 信度结构 weapon system of systems capability requirement satisfactory degree evidential reasoning belief rule base belief structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1胡晓峰,杨镜宇,吴琳,司光亚.武器装备体系能力需求论证及探索性仿真分析实验[J].系统仿真学报,2008,20(12):3065-3068. 被引量:28
  • 2DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD architecture framework version 2.0[R]. USA: Department of Defense, 2009.
  • 3Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence[M]. Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 4Yang J B, Liu J, Wang J, et al. Belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning approach RIMER[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 2006, 36(2): 266 285.
  • 5Yang J B, Xu D L. On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A : Systems and Humans, 2002, 32(3): 289-304.
  • 6Bustince H, Burillo P. Mathematical analysis of interval-valued fuzzy relations: Application to approximate reasoning[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 113:205-219.
  • 7Chen S M,Hsiao W H. Bidirectional approximate reasoning for rule-based systems using interval-valued fllzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 113:185-203.
  • 8Viaene S, Wets G, Vanthienen J. A synthesis of fuzzy rule-based system verification[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 113:253-265.
  • 9Wang Y M, Yang J B, Xu D L. Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174:1885-1913.

二级参考文献5

共引文献27

同被引文献534

引证文献49

二级引证文献237

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部