摘要
《最高人民法院关于案例指导工作的规定》所构建的案例指导制度存在着合法性缺陷。从形式上看,案例指导制度的建立缺乏宪法和法律上的根据;从内容上看,关于指导性案例之确定和效力的规定与指导性案例产生于审判过程的经验性质相悖。案例指导制度的合法性问题是一个需要我们慎重对待的问题。
There is legitimacy deficiency in case direction system, which was built by The Provision of the Supreme People ＂s Court on Case Direction. In the form, there is no legal basis of establishing a case direction system according to Constitution and related laws. In the content, the provisions on both definition and validity of directing cases conflicts with the empirical nature of directing cases, as directing cases arises from the process of judicial trials. We should take the legitimacy of case direction system seriously.
出处
《江苏社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第6期141-147,共7页
Jiangsu Social Sciences
基金
南京大学"985"三期科研项目的支持
