基于多目标群决策迭代算法的PPP项目合作伙伴选择被引量：21

Partner-Selection in Public-Private Partnership Project Based on an Iterative Algorithm for the Multi-Objective Group Decision Problem

下载PDF

导出

摘要基于决策个体满意度水平的基础上,运用赋权的方法导出决策个体的总体满意度和群体的联合满意度,使PPP基础设施建设项目参与群体的联合满意度极大化作为项目群决策的规则,从而求解PPP项目多目标群决策问题的最佳调和解。并由于决策个体目标以及各子目标间的矛盾性,当决策个体的个体满意度水平过高时,会导致PPP项目群决策中各决策个体的决策无法协调,因此,通过降低和修正各个决策主体的满意度水平,运用迭代的方法和原理,设计PPP项目中涉及多目标群决策的公私合作伙伴选择的算法及方案,从而得出多目标群决策下的满意解。 Based on the degree of satisfaction of individual decisions,this paper induces the individual＇s degree of satisfaction and the group＇s aggregaed satisfaction through weighting,It then proposes a rule that the group compromised solution is the one maximizing the degree of the group＇s aggregation satisfaction who participates in PPP project.Due to the conflict among the objects of the decision individuals and sub-objects,if the the individual＇s degree of satisfaction is too high,it is hard to coordinate the objects of individuals,Thus individuals have to reduce their degree of satisfaction in order to get a compromised solution.using an iterative algorithm,a satisfactory solution to the multi-objective group decision problem in the PPP projects is obtained.

作者宋波徐飞

机构地区上海师范大学旅游学院上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院

出处《系统管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期690-695,共6页 Journal of Systems & Management

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972065) 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(11YJC630178) 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2011EJL002) 上海市科委软科学研究博士生论文资助项目(200906012)

关键词公私合作伙伴关系满意度群决策伙伴选择 public-private partnership degree of satisfaction group decision partner-selection

分类号 F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献13

1Jamali D B. Success and failure mechanisms of public private partnerships (PPPs) in developing countries: Insights from the Lebanese context [J].The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2004, 17 (5) : 414--430.
2Henisz W V J, School T W. Governance issues in public private partnerships [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2006, 24: 537-538.
3Hodge G A, Greve C. Public-private partnerships.. An international performance review [J]. Public Administration Review, 2007, 67(3): 545-558.
4Lee In Kwon, Hahn Kyungdong. Bid-rigging in auctions for korean public-works contracts and potential damage[J]. Review of Industrial Organization,2002,21(1):73-88.
5Taylor, P. Do public sector contract catering tender procedures result in an auction for " lemons"?[J]. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2005, 18(6):484-497.
6Boehm F, Olaya J. Corruption in Public Contracting Auctions: The Role of Transparency in Bidding Processes[J]. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 2006, 77(4): 431-452.
7Chong E, Huet F, Saussier S. Auctions, ex post competition and prices: The efficiency of public-pri- vate partnerships[J]. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 2006, 77(4):521-554.
8Zitron J. Public-private partnership projects: Towards a model of contractor bidding decision-making [J]. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 2006, 12: 53-62.
9Hackney R, Jones S. Towards an e-Government efficiency agenda: The impact of information and com- munication behaviour on e-Reverse auctions in public sector procurement[J]. European Journal of Information Systems,2007, 16(2): 178-191.
10Dakshina G. De Silva, Timothy D, et al. The impact of public information on bidding in highway procure- ment auctions [ J ]. European Economic Review, 2008, 52:150-181.