摘要
目的比较细菌性肝脓肿不同手术治疗方法的疗效。方法回顾性分析收治的40例细菌性肝脓肿患者的临床资料,随机分为经皮穿刺组(24例)与微创组(16例),比较两组的治愈率、并发症发生率、住院时间。结果两组患者治愈率及平均住院时间无明显差异(P>0.05);经皮穿刺组并发症发生率为4.17%,微创组为12.5%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论经皮穿刺及微创治疗细菌性肝脓肿方法均有效,但经皮穿刺并发症率低,可作为首选治疗。
Objective To assess the effect of different surgical treatments of pyogenic liver abscesses. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical data from 40 patients with pyogenic liver abscesses was performed. The patients were divided into percutaneously group（24 patients） and minimally invasively group （16 patients） according to the different treatment method at random. The rate of treatment success and the procedurerelated complications, the length of hospital stay were compared between the groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference in patients between groups at the rate of treatment success and the mean length of hospital stay. The rate of the procedure-related complications in percutaneous and minimally invasively group was 4.17% VS 12.5% respectively with statistically significantly difference. Conclusion Percutaneous and minimally invasively treatment of pyogenic live abscesses are both effective, percutaneous drainage carries lower rate of the procedure-related complications and should be the first-line treatment.
出处
《当代医学》
2012年第1期15-16,共2页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
细菌性肝脓肿
经皮穿刺
微创手术
Pyogenic liver abscesses
Percutaneous treatment
Minimally invasive operation
