摘要
目的:为省、地(市)级公务员录用考试编制“一般行政能力倾向测验”(简称GAAT)。方法:通过工作分析等方法确定GAAT的内容和结构,经实际使用后进行结构及内容分析,并作信度和效度检验。结果:测验总体难度为0538,试题的区分度>0.2;各分量表间存在中、低度相关(0.2143～04909),与总分的相关较高(05858～08326);按分量表进行因素分析得两个特征值>1的因素,按分测验进行因素分析得四个特征值>1的因素。GAAT的α系数为0932,分量表为0882～0935;间隔一个月的重测相关为0836。被试在GAAT的总分和一些分量表中存在着年龄、性别及学历间的差异,但分值差异不大(1～6分);GAAT的总分及分测验与长—鞍团体智力测验的总IQ及三个因素间明显相关;经考试录用的公务员的工作业绩及实际能力优于非考试录用者。结论:GAAT包含了公务员基本能力倾向的测量内容;量表的结构合理,内部一致性及稳定性较好,达到了心理测量学的基本要求;以有关的内容和测验等作效标证明了GAAT的有效性。
Objective: To construct the General Administrative Aptitude Test (GAAT) for the government functionary. Methods: The content and structure of the GAAT were established by the method of work analysis, and use of the GAAT in actual entrance examinations. Reliability and validity of the GAAT were examined by test-retest, group comparison, correlation and factor analyses. Results: The overall difficulty of the test was 0.538, the discrimination of all items was over 0.20. There were middle or lower coefficients of correlation between the subscale scores (0.2143～0.4909), but the coefficients of correlation between the subscales and the overall scores were higher(0.5858～0.8326). There were two main factors revealed by factors analysis of the subscales, and four main factors by factor analysis of subtests. The homogeneity reliability of GAAT was 0.932; correlation of retesting after one month was 0.836. There were some discrepancies with respect to age, sex, and education level, but the scores of GAAT on the discrepancies were not very high (1-6). There was obvious correlation between the GAAT and CAITG. Comparison of the two government functionaries' groups on their manifest work and actual abilities showed that the first group that had an entrance examination had higher working quantity and quality, mastery in knowledge and cognizing ability. Conclusion: The structure of the GAAT is reasonable, and its reliability and validity meet the need of psychometrics.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSCD
2000年第1期1-6,共6页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
国家人事部人事考试中心委托并得到项目资助
