摘要
在现今的多边贸易体制之下,国营贸易企业承担了多重义务。除GATT第17条对国营贸易企业明确的义务界定之外,国营贸易企业还需承担作为补贴提供者、补贴接受者与反垄断法上的义务。这些义务体现了现行多边贸易规则对国家参与经济的不信任。国营贸易承担的多重义务,从根本上讲是多哈回合农业谈判关于国营贸易存废之争的投射。对我国而言,在积极参与新规则的谈判与修订、为本国国营贸易企业创造合法的发展空间之余,还应同时采用包括私营贸易企业、行业协会等其他手段,完善对出口竞争的统筹与调控。
Under the current multilateral trade system, State Trading Enterprises (STE in short) undertake multiple layers of obligations. Besides GATT XVII, STE also undertakes obligations under trade remedy laws as providers of subsidies, recipients of subsidies as well as under antitrust law. These obligations reflect the distrust of current multilateral trade rules against States' participation in economics. The multiple obligations, in essence, are only a reflection of the debate of the fate of STE in the Doha round's agricultural negotiations. As to China, besides active participation of the negotiations of new trade rules so as to create lawful environments for the development of Chinese STE, it's also advisable to adopt additional methods such as private export trading corporations, industrial associations and so on in order to improve the regulation and coordination of export competition.
基金
对外经济贸易大学"211工程"三期"中国应对国外反补贴调查策略"项目的资助
关键词
国营贸易
多重义务
GATT第17条
反补贴
价格联盟
出口贸易公司
state trading
multiple obligations
GATT Article XVII
countervailing
price cartel
export trading corporation