中国对外直接投资逆向技术溢出的境外地区分布差异性研究被引量：16

The Analysis of Reverse Technology Spillovers Distribution Differences though China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment

下载PDF

导出

摘要基于中国对外直接投资的不同境外地区分布,测算了来自不同类型国家(地区)的R&D溢出;然后运用DEA方法计算出中国平均生产率(Malmquist指数)、技术效率(EC指数)和技术进步(TC指数),并与不同类型国家所产生的逆向技术溢出进行灰色关联分析。得到以下结论:中国对新兴国家(地区)直接投资的逆向技术溢出效果最好,其次是发达国家(地区),最后是其他发展中国家(地区);中国平均全要素生产率及其分解指数与外国研发溢出呈中等关联度,其中,与来自新兴国家(地区)、发达国家(地区)的逆向技术溢出关联度较强,而与来自其他发展中国家(地区)的逆向技术溢出关联度则较低。因此,中国应调整对外直接投资的海外布局,在巩固新兴国家(地区)市场份额的基础上,开始向发达国家(地区)倾斜。 This paper estimates RD spillovers from different types of countries（regions） based on the outside distribution of China＇s OFDI;then use DEA method to calculate the average Chinese productivity（Malmquist index）,technical efficiency（EC index） and technological progress（TC index）;and applies gray correlation to analyze the two above.The conclusions are： China gains the best reverse technology spillovers from emerging countries（regions）,followed by the developed countries（regions）,and finally the other developing countries（regions）.China＇s average total factor productivity index and its decomposition have quite strong correlation with the RD spillovers from emerging countries（regions） as well as developed countries（regions）,but have mild correlation with the RD spillovers from other developing countries（regions）.Therefore,China should adjust its OFDI distribution which may keep the market rate of emerging countries（regions） and begin to develop the market of developed countries（regions）.

作者欧阳艳艳

机构地区中山大学国际商学院

出处《华南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 2012年第1期43-50,共8页 Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)

基金国家社会科学基金青年项目(11CJL042) 中国博士后科学基金项目(20100480807) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(10wkjc05)

关键词对外直接投资逆向技术溢出境外地区差异 Outward Foreign Direct Investment Reverse Technology Spillovers Outside Distribution Differences

分类号 F830.59 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1CAVES R E. Multinational Firms, Competion and Productivity in Host Country Market [J]. Economica, 1971, (38) :1.
2FINDLAY R. Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment and Transfer of Technology [ J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1978, (92) :2 - 16.
3COE D T, HELPMAN E. International R&D Spillovers. European Economic Review[J]. 1995, (39) : 859 -887.
4XU B, WANG J. Capital Goods Trade and R&D Spillovers in the OECD [ J ]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1999, 32(5) :1258 - 1274.
5BRANSTETFER L. Is Foreign Direct Investment a Channel of Knowledge Spillovers? Evidence from Japan' s FDI in the United States [R]. NBER Working Paper. 2000. No. 8015.
6VAN POTFELSBERGHE DE LA POTrERIE B, LICHTENBERG F. Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology across Borders? [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2001, 83(3) : 490 -497.
7GWANGHOON L. , The Effectiveness of International Knowledge Spillover Channels [ J ]. European Economic Review, 2006, (50) : 2075 - 2088.
8林青,陈湛匀.中国技术寻求型跨国投资战略:理论与实证研究——基于主要10个国家FDI反向溢出效应模型的测度[J].财经研究,2008,34(6):86-99. 被引量：32
9刘明霞.我国对外直接投资的逆向技术溢出效应——基于省际面板数据的实证分析[J].国际商务（对外经济贸易大学学报）,2009(4):61-67. 被引量：26
10BITZER J, KEREKES M. Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology across Borders? New Evidence [ J ]. Economics Leters, 2008, (100) :355 -358.