期刊文献+

Investor Protection, Deviation of Local Accounting Standards From IFRS, and the Effectiveness of the IFRS Adoption 被引量:1

Investor Protection, Deviation of Local Accounting Standards From IFRS, and the Effectiveness of the IFRS Adoption
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The objective of this study is to examine the effect of accounting standards and investor protection on value relevance of earnings and book value of equity among European Union countries during the years 1999-2007. The results indicate that the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards [IFRS] leads to improvement in value relevance, particularly on earnings. We also examine the impact of investor protection and the deviation of local accounting standards from IFRS on the effectiveness of the IFRS adoption. The results show supporting evidence for investor protection but inconclusive evidence for accounting standard deviation. However, additional analysis indicates that the countries which apparently benefit from adopting IFRS are those with high deviation of local accounting standards from IFRS and high investor protection. The findings imply that adopting IFRS alone cannot improve value relevance of accounting information, but standard setters and regulators need to strengthen their investor protection mechanisms in order to improve the quality of accounting information.
出处 《Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing》 2011年第12期1329-1343,共15页 现代会计与审计(英文版)
关键词 investor protection accounting standard IFRS adoption value relevance 标准偏差 财务报告 会计准则 投资者 国际 保护 会计信息质量 欧盟国家
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Alford, A., Jones, J., Leftwich, R., & Zmijewski, M. (1993). The relative informativeness of accounting disclosures in different countries. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(3), 183-223.
  • 2All, A., & Hwang, L, (2000, Spring). Country-specific factors related to financial reporting and the value relevance of accounting data. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 1-21.
  • 3Amir, E., Harris, T. S., & Venuti, E. K. (1993). A comparison of the value-relevance of U.S. versus non-U.S. GAAP accounting measures using form 20-F reconciliations. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(3), 230-264.
  • 4Ashbaugh, H., & Pincus, M. (2001, December). Domestic accounting standards, international accounting standards, and the predictability of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 417-434.
  • 5Auer, K. V. (1996). Capital market reactions to earnings announcements: Empirical evidence on the difference in the information content of IAS-based earnings and EC-directives-based earnings. The European Accounting Review, 5(4), 587-623.
  • 6Bae, K., Tan, H., & Welker, M. (2008, May). International GAAP differences: The impact on foreign analysts. The Accounting Review, 83, 593-628.
  • 7Ball, R. (2006). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and cons for investors. Accounting and Business Research, 36(special issue), 5-27.
  • 8Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Robin, A. (2000, February). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economies, 29, 1-51.
  • 9Barth, M. E., Landsman, W, R., & Lang, M. H. (2008, June). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 467-498.
  • 10Boonlert-U-Thai, K., Meek, G. K., & Nabar, S. (2006). Earnings attributes and investor-protection: International evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(4), 327-357.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部