期刊文献+

一次性包皮环切吻合器与包皮环扎和传统包皮环切术的疗效比较 被引量:26

Clinical efficiency analysis between Micro-injury Peritomy Anastomoses Device,foreskin cerclage and the conventional circumcision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨应用一次性包皮环切吻合器与包皮环扎和传统包皮环切术式的临床疗效比较。方法:对包茎和包皮过长患者,分别采用一次性包皮环切吻合器环切术、包皮环扎术、传统包皮环切术,并对其术前、术中、术后三方面进行比较。结果:一次性包皮环切吻合器环切术除价格相对较贵外,其它方面都优于包皮环扎术和传统包皮环切术。结论:一次性包皮环切吻合器环切术简单、安全、无需缝合、外观美观,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To compare the clinical efficiency between Micro-injury Peritomy Anastomoses Device,foreskin cerclage and the conventional circumcision. Methods The patients of phimosis and redundant prepuce were taken operations with peritomy anastomoses device,foreskin cerclage,conventional circumcision,they were compared in aspects of before operation,between operation and after operation. Results Compred with the conventional surgery group and foreskin cerclage group,the peritomy anastomoses device group experienced more costly but have more advantages in other aspects. Conclusions The procedure with peritomy anastomoses device is much more simpler, safer,achieving without suturing,and good outlook as well.It is worth popularizing.
作者 彭友林
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2012年第1期19-21,共3页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词 包皮环吻合器 包皮环扎术 包皮环切术 包茎 包皮过长 peritomy anastomoses device foreskin cerclage circumcision phimosis redundant prepuce
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献39

共引文献331

同被引文献110

引证文献26

二级引证文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部