期刊文献+

完整结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌的对比研究 被引量:114

Complete mesocolic excision versus traditional radical resection in colon cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)与传统根治术治疗结肠癌的短期疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析2009年11月至2011年8月间在北京大学人民医院胃肠外科接受CME手术治疗的54例结肠癌患者(CME组)的临床资料,并选取2008年1月至2009年10月间同一手术治疗组施行传统结肠癌根治术的38例结肠癌患者作为对照组.比较两组患者的短期治疗效果和安全性。结果CME组淋巴结清扫数量为(22.2±8.0)枚,明显多于对照组f(18.6±4.7)枚,P〈0.05];其中Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期病例两组间淋巴结清扫数量的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),Ⅲ期病例CME组淋巴结清扫数量明显增多[(23.8+7.6)枚比(16.7+3.6)枚,P〈0.01];但两组Ⅲ期患者阳性淋巴结数和阳性淋巴结率的差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组间手术时间、术后排气排粪时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05);但术中出血量CME组显著少于对照组(中位数100ml比115ml,P〈0.05)。结论CME手术可以整块、彻底地切除癌灶和系膜组织,从而达到清扫淋巴结的最大化。尽管CME切除范围大,但并不会增加手术风险和术后并发症发生率.术后短期疗效良好。 Objective To compare the short-term efficacy and safety between complete mesocolic excision (CME) and traditional radical resection in colon cancer. Methods Between January 2008 and August 2011, 92 patients undergoing elective open surgery for colon were included in the study. CME was performed in 54 patients in the period from November 2009 to August 2011. The other 38 patients underwent traditional radical resection from January 2008 to October 2009. Short-term outcomes were compared between the patients of two different time periods. Results Lymph nodes retrieved inthe CME group (22.2±8.0) were significant more than that in the control group (18.6±4.7)(P〈0.05). In patients with stage Ⅲ cancer, CME group was associated with higher lymph node counts (23.8±7.6 vs. 16.7±3.6, P〈0.01), however, there were no significant differences for those with stage Ⅰ and stage Ⅱ cancer (P〉 0.05). The number of positive lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio(LNR) for stage Ⅲ patients in two groups were not significantly different (P〉0.05). There were no differences in operation time, time to first bowel movement, hospital stay, and postoperative complications between the two groups (P〉0.05). However, intraoperative blood loss in the CME group was significantly reduced (median, 100 vs. 115 ml, P〈0.05). Conclusions CME can achieve en-bloc resection of the tumor and mesocolon, and have optimal lymph nodes harvest. Despite wider resection extent with CME technique, the surgical risk andpostoperative complications are not increased and the short-term efficacy is good.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS 2012年第1期19-23,共5页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基金 首都临床特色应用研究项目(Z111107058811046)
关键词 结肠肿瘤 完整结肠系膜切除术 淋巴结清扫 治疗效果 安全性 Colonic neoplasms Complete mesoeolic excision Lymph node dissection Treatment outcomes Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Cucino C, Buchner AM, Sonnenherg A. Continued rightward shift of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002,45 (8): 1035-1040.
  • 2Rabeneck L, Davila JA, E1-Serag HB. Is there a ture "shift" to the right colnn in the incidence of colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol, 2003,98 (6) : 1400-1409.
  • 3McDermott FT, Hughes ES, Pihl E, et at. Comparative results of surgical management of single carcinomas of the colon and rectum: a series of 1939 patients managed by one surgeon.Br J Surg, 1981,68 (12) : 850-855.
  • 4Birgisson H, Talback M, Gunnarsson U, et al. Improved survival in cancer of the colon and rectum in Sweden. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2005,31 (5) : 845-853.
  • 5Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation-technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11 (4) : 354-365.
  • 6叶颖江,Hohenberger W,王杉.结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除——规范化质量控制手术的趋势[J].中国实用外科杂志,2011,31(6):470-472. 被引量:54
  • 7West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, et al. Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol, 2008,9 (9) : 857-865.
  • 8Tan KY, Kawamura YJ, Mizokami K, et al. Distribution of the first metastatic lymph node in colon cancer and its clinical significance. Coloreetal Dis, 2010, 12( 1 ) :44-47.
  • 9李国新,丁自海,张策,黄祥成,钟世镇.腹腔镜下左半结肠切除术相关筋膜平面的解剖观察[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2006,24(3):298-301. 被引量:60
  • 10Johnson PM, Porter CA, Ricciardi R, et al. Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage Ⅲ B and Ⅲ C colon cancer. J Clin Oncal, 2006,24(22) :3570-3575.

二级参考文献22

  • 1张策,丁自海,李国新,黄祥成,钟世镇.全直肠系膜切除相关盆自主神经的解剖学观察[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2006,24(1):60-64. 被引量:47
  • 2West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, et al. Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a ret- rospective observational study [J]. Lancet Oncol,2008,9(9): 857-865.
  • 3Pramateftakis MG. Optimizing colonic cancer surgery: high liga- tion and complete mesocolic excision during right hemicolectomy [J]. Tech Coloproctol,2010,14 (suppl 1):49-51.
  • 4Guillou P J, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSIC trial): muhicentre, ran- domized controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2005,365(8): 1718-1726.
  • 5West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, et al. Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a ret-rospective observational study [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2008,9(9): 857-865.
  • 6Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central liga- tion-technical notes and outcome [J]. Colorectal Dis,2009,11 (4):354-364.
  • 7West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcino- ma of the colon[J]. J Clin Oncol,2010, 28(2):272-278.
  • 8Eiholm S, Ovesen H. Total mesocolic excision versus traditional resection in right-sided colon cancer-method and increased lymph node harvest[J ]. Dan Med Bull,2010, 57(12):4224.
  • 9Condon RE.Resection of the colon.In:Zuidema GA,ed.Schackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract [M],4th ed.Philadelphia:Saunders,1995:207~236.
  • 10钟世镇,韩永坚,刘牧之.临床解剖学丛书:腹盆腔分册[M].人民卫生出版社,1992,411.

共引文献111

同被引文献598

引证文献114

二级引证文献613

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部