期刊文献+

MR扩散张量成像表观扩散系数和各向异性分数对不同病程颈脊髓压迫症的诊断价值 被引量:5

The diagnosis value of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy of MR-diffusion tensor imaging for different courses of cervical cord compression
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨MR扩散张量成像(MR-diffulsiontensorimaging,MR-DTI)表观扩散系数(ADC)和各向异性分数(FA)对不同病程颈脊髓压迫症的诊断价值。方法:2010年1月-2011年6月经MRI常规检查诊断为颈脊髓压迫症的患者50例,其中急性颈脊髓压迫患者15例(A组),均为外伤患者,在伤后72h内接受MRI检查;慢性颈脊髓压迫23例(B组),均为脊髓型颈椎病患者,病程超过6个月;慢性合并急性颈脊髓压迫12例(C组),均有超过6个月的脊髓型颈椎病病史。且本次MRI检查前72h内受到颈部外伤累及颈髓。15例健康志愿者为对照组(D组),MRI常规检查颈脊髓未见异常。4组均行MR-DTI检查,测量A、B、C组患者颈脊髓受压处及D组C5/6椎间盘平面脊髓的ADC和FA,并行组间比较。结果:A、B、C、D组的ADC分别为(0.712±0.241)×10^-3mm^2/s、(1.012±0.256)×10^-3mm^2/s、(0.812±0.125)×10^-3mm^2/s、(0.823±0.106)×10^-3mm^2/s,FA分另4为0.401±0.098、0.472±0.095、0.496±0.172、0.541±0.158。A组ADC和FA与D组比较均明显降低(P〈0.05);B组FA与D组比较明显降低、ADC明显增高(P〈0.05);C组ADC与D组比较无显著性差异(P〉0.05),FA值低于D组(P〈0.05)。A组ADC及FA均低于B、C组(P〈0.05);B组ADC高于C组,FA低于C组,组间差异有显著性(P〈0.05)。结论:MR-DTI的ADC及FA对不同病程颈脊髓压迫症有诊断价值。 Objectives: To study the diagnosis value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) of MR-diffusion tensor imaging (MR-DTI) for different courses of cervical cord compression. Methods: 50 patients with cervical cord compression were involved in this study from January 2010 to June 2011. These patients were divided into 3 groups, group A: acute cervical cord compression,gronp(n=15) underwent the cervical cord MRI within 72h after the injury; group B: chronic cervical cord compression group (n=23) had more than 6 months cervical myelopathy history; group C: chronic history with acute cervical cord compression group(n=12) had more than 6 months cervical myelopathy history and suffered from an acute cervical cord injury, and underwent the MR scan within 72h after the injury; group D included 15 healthy vol- unteers with normal MRI. All cases in 4 groups underwent MR-DTI.The values of ADC and FA in the com- pressed cervical cord in group A, B and C, and those at C5/6 in group D were meassured and compared. Results: The values of ADC in group A, B, C and D were (0.712±0.241)×10^-3mm^2/s、(1.012±0.256)×10^-3mm^2/s、(0.812±0.125)×10^-3mm^2/s and (0.823±0.106)×10^-3mm^2/srespectively, and the values of FA in group A, B, C and D were 0.401±0.098, 0.472±0.095, 0.496±0.172 and 0.541±0.158 respectively. Group A had significantly lower values of ADC and FA than group D(P〈0.05); the FA decreased and ADC increased in group B com- pared with group D(P〈0.05). The value of ADC had no change(P〉0.05), but the value of FA decreased(P〈0.05) in group C compared with group D. Group A had lower values of ADC and FA than group B and C (P〈0.05), and group B had higher value of ADC and lower value of FA than group C, which showed signif- icant difference(P〈0.05). Conclusions: The ADC and FA under MR-DTI can determine different courses of cervical cord compression.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期147-151,共5页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 颈脊髓压迫症 MRI MR扩散张量成像 表观扩散系数 各向异性分数 Cervical cord compression MRI MR-diffusion tensor imaging Apparent diffusion coefficient Fractional anisotropy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献60

  • 1王霄英,谭可,倪石磊,孙非,鲍圣德,蒋学祥.MRI和DTI评价犬急性脊髓损伤后的形态及功能改变[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(12):1821-1824. 被引量:15
  • 2张劲松,宦怡,孙立军,赵海涛,葛雅丽,常英娟,杨春敏.扩散加权成像在脊髓急性外伤中的应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):464-468. 被引量:21
  • 3吴叶,侯树勋,何海龙,贾连顺.颈脊髓慢性压迫模型的建立及其病理改变[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(1):57-61. 被引量:15
  • 4DeoAA, Crill RJ, Hasan KM, et.al. In vivo seriai diffusion tensor imaging of experimental spinal cord injury [J]. J Neurosci Res, 2006, 83 (5):801 - 810.
  • 5Herrera J.J. Chacko T. Narayama PA, et al. Histological correlation of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in experimental spinal cord injury[J]. J Neuroscience research, 2008,86:443- 447.
  • 6Wheel-Kingshott CA, Hickman SJ, Parker GJ, et al. Investigating cervical spinal cord structure using axial diffusion tensor imaging[J]. Neuroimage, 2002, 16:93-102.
  • 7Tsuchiya K, Fujikawa h, Honya K, et al. Tractography of the lower spinal cord with diffusion tensor imaging using parallel imaging[C].RSNA 91st Scientific assembly and annul meet ing, Chicago, USA, 2005: 443.
  • 8Maier SE, Mamata H, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the spinal cord. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1064:50-60.
  • 9Summers P, Staempfli P, Jaermann et al. A preliminary study of the effects of trigger timing on diffusion tensor imaging of the human spinal cord. Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1952-1961.
  • 10Melham ER, Mori S, Mukundan G, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain and white matter tractography .AJNR 2002;178: 3-15.

共引文献49

同被引文献64

  • 1张军,许百男.质子磁共振波谱在颅脑创伤中的应用进展[J].医学临床研究,2012,29(6). 被引量:3
  • 2张劲松,宦怡,孙立军,赵海涛,葛雅丽,常英娟,杨春敏.扩散加权成像在脊髓急性外伤中的应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):464-468. 被引量:21
  • 3张劲松,钱蕴秋,宦怡,葛雅丽,常英娟,赵海涛.扩散加权成像在脊髓型颈椎病中的应用[J].放射学实践,2005,20(9):757-760. 被引量:7
  • 4王霄英,谭可,倪石磊,鲍圣德,蒋学祥.用MR扩散张量成像评价犬急性脊髓损伤后神经前体细胞移植的作用[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(1):17-21. 被引量:30
  • 5Clark CA, Werring DJ. Diffusion tensor imaging in spinal cord : methods and applications-a review [ J]. NMR Biomed, 2002, 15 (728) : 578 -586.
  • 6Schwartz ED, Hackney DB. Diffusion-weighted MRI and the e- valuation of spinal cord axonal integrity following injury and treatment[J]. Exp Neurol, 2003, 184 (2) : 570-589.
  • 7Tsuchiya K, Fujikawa A, Suzuki Y. Diffusion tractography of the cervical spinal cord by using parallel imaging [ J ]. AJNR, 2005, 26:398 -400.
  • 8Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Fujikawa A, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the cervical spinal cord using a single shot fast spin echo technique:findings in normal subjects and in myelomalacia[ J]. Neuroradiol, 2003, 45:90 -94.
  • 9Demir A, Ries M, Moonen CT, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR ima- ging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion ten- sor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy [ J ]. Radiology, 2003, 229(1) :37 -43.
  • 10Budde MD, Kim JH, Liang HF, et al. Toward accurate diagno- sis of white matter pathology using diffusion tensor imaging [ J ]. Magn Reson Med, 2007, 57(4) :688 -695.

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部