期刊文献+

震后地下拱结构的抗冲击波动载能力评估 被引量:8

RESIDUAL DYNAMIC RESISTANCE OF SEISMIC DAMAGED UNDERGROUND ARCH
原文传递
导出
摘要 为正确评估震后地下防护结构的抗动载能力,对汶川地震地下防护结构的破坏状况进行了分析,根据结构震后破坏模式建立了相应的结构损伤力学模型,提出了震前固端拱在震后劣化为三铰拱的结构分析方法。针对不同结构型式,给出了动荷载动力系数的确定方法,通过计算得到了在相同均布荷载作用下地下拱形结构的弯矩和拱脚推力的计算公式。针对具体实例,计算了不同损伤型式的拱结构承受冲击波荷载时的结构内力,从而给出了震后结构的抗动载能力评估方法。研究表明,地下防护结构震后抗冲击能力下降可达50%以上。 Based on the investigation on the aseismic damage of underground structures in Wenchuan earthquake,the main damage modes of underground protective arch structures were summarized.Simplified structural models for damaged arches,including two-hinged and three-hinged arches,were built according to the damage modes and distributions.Residual dynamic resistances of seismic damaged underground arches were calculated by equivalent static load method.Through case studies,moments of arches with different constraints were analyzed under shock wave load,as well as the thrust force at the foot of the arches.Then the ability of anti-dynamic load of the damaged structure after eartheuake was evaluated.It is concluded that the load capapcity of the damaged arch drops by 16 per cent or even 50 per cent when controled by bending or shear resistance,respectively.
出处 《工程力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期159-164,171,共7页 Engineering Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51078351) 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金(51021001) 先进建筑材料四川省重点实验室(西南科技大学)开放基金项目(09zxxk05) 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部实验室(河海大学)开放基金项目(GH200905) 抗震工程技术四川省重点实验室(西南交通大学)开放基金项目
关键词 地下拱形结构 地震损伤 剩余承载能力 冲击荷载 计算模型 underground protective arch seismic damaged structure residual dynamic resistance shock loading structural model
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Takashi Matsuda, et al. A study on damage of underground subway structures during the 1995 HYOGO-KEN NAMBU earthquake [C]. Geotechnical Engineering in Recovery from Earthquake Disaster, KIG-Forum, 1997.
  • 2Susumu Nakamura, et al. Investigation, analysis and restoration of the collapsed DAIKAI subway station during the 1995 HYOGO-KEN NAMBU earthquake [C]. Proceeding of JSCE, 1995.
  • 3Hayashi Y, Tamura K, Mori M, Takahashi I. Simulation analyses of buildings damaged in the 1995 Kobe, Japan, Earthquake considering soil-structure interaction [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1997, 28(4): 371-391.
  • 4An X, Shawky A A, Maekawa K. The collapse mechanism of a subway station during the Great Hanshin Earthquake [J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 1997, 19(3): 241-257.
  • 5Hashash Y M A, Hook J J, Schmidt B, et al. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures [J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(4): 247-293.
  • 6John C M, Zahrah T F. Aseismic design of underground structures [J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 1987, 2(2): 165- 197.
  • 7Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons. TM5-855-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station [S]. Vicksburg, Miss., Jul. 1984.
  • 8Krauthammer T, Puglisi R D. Simplified analysis of buried reinforced concrete arches under simulated nuclear loads [J]. Computers & Structures, 1992, 43: 1029- 1039.
  • 9Stevens D J, Krauthammer T. Analysis of blast-loaded, buried arch response. Part I: numerical approach [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991, 117: 197-212.
  • 10Stevens D J, Krauthammer T, Chandra D. Analysis of blast-loaded, buried arch response. Part II: application [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 1991, 117: 213 -234.

同被引文献59

  • 1贾彬,李正良,陶俊林,姚华川,范超.混凝土SHPB试验数值模拟研究[J].固体力学学报,2010,31(S1):216-222. 被引量:20
  • 2徐景茂,顾金才,陈安敏,汪涛,张向阳.爆炸平面波作用下大跨度洞室稳定性模型试验研究[J].岩土力学,2013,34(S1):47-53. 被引量:7
  • 3The Design of Structures to Resist the Effects of Atomic Weapons. EM 1110-345-414 to 421 [R]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, for Office of the Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army, Washington, D. C.; 15 March 1957; Unclassified.
  • 4Robbins D Y. Analysis Report for Basic Types of Underground Structures [R]. Contract No. DA-22-079-eng-196 with Holmes and Narver, Inc., U. S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi; Secret, Restricted Data. October 1956.
  • 5范华林,金丰年,许宏发,周健南.汶川地震巾地下(国防/人防)工程结构破坏特征分析[c].纪念汶川地震一周年抗震减灾专题学术讨论会,成都,2009.
  • 6Fundamentals of protective design for conventionalweapons. TM5-855-1.U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station [S]. Vicksburg, Miss., Jul. 1984.
  • 7Krauthammer T, Puglisi R D. Simplified analysis of buried reinforced concrete arches under simulated nuclear loads [J]. Computers & Structures, 1992, 43: 1029-- 1039.
  • 8Stevens D J, Krauthammer T. Analysis of blast-loaded, buried arch response. Part I: Numerical approach [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991, 117: 197--211.
  • 9Stevens D J, Krauthammer T, Chandra D. Analysis of blast-loaded, buried arch response. Part Ⅱ: Application [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991, 117: 213--234.
  • 10Dharaneepathy M V, Kewava Rao M N, Santhakumar A R. The influence of geometry on the blast response of circular arches [J]. Computers & Structures, 1992, 45: 755--763.

引证文献8

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部