期刊文献+

爱丁堡学派解构默顿科学社会学的三元向度

Three Topics of Edinburgh School’s Deconstruction of the Sociology of Science of Merton
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪70年代伊始,默顿科学社会学受到了来自各方的批判,其中,爱丁堡学派可谓是最激进的代表。爱丁堡学派主要从三个方面对默顿科学社会学进行了全面的解构:其一,极力批判默顿科学社会学对科学知识进行"黑箱化"处理,倡导对科学知识进行社会学分析;其二,质疑默顿科学规范理论,不仅直接批评了默顿科学规范的独特性和有效性,还强调与默顿科学规范相悖的科学中的利益和权威等因素;其三,对同行承认作了本质上不同于默顿的解读。与默顿迥异,爱丁堡学派认为,同行承认只是科学奖励制度的一个中介环节,激励科学家从事科学活动的最终因素是包含利益因素的科学家个人的特定要求和需要得到满足。 From the 1970s, sociology of scientific knowledge was criticized from different parties and Edinburgh School wasthe most jacobinical one. The Edinburgh School deconstructed sociology of science of Merton from three directions mainly, that is,first, they criticized that Merton had studied scientific knowledge in the black box process and advocated analysis of scientificknowledge from the sociological perspective; second, they not only criticized the specificity and effectiveness of scientific norms,but also stressed the authority and interests in science which are contrary to Merton’s scientific norms; third, they had interpretationof peer recognition essentially different from Merton’s. The Edinburgh School thought peer recognition was only an intermediate linkof science award system and the ultimate incentive is that specific requirements and needs of scientists are met.
作者 艾战胜
机构地区 广东商学院
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期89-93,122,共6页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 广东省哲学社会科学十一五规划项目"科学规范的基本问题研究"(08YC-03)
关键词 科学社会学 科学规范 同行承认 默顿 爱丁堡学派 Sociology of science Scientific norm Peer recognition Merton Edinburgh School
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1斯蒂芬.科尔,郝刘祥.默顿对科学社会学的贡献[J].科学文化评论,2005,2(3):41-55. 被引量:7
  • 2Leon Ohve, Knowledge, Society and Reality Problems of the Social Analysis of Knowledge and of Scientific Redism, Rodopi BV: Amsterdam - atlanta. GA, 1993.
  • 3罗伯特·金·默顿(美).科学社会学散忆[M].鲁旭东,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
  • 4Ben - David Joseph, Sociology of Science Knowledge, J. F. Short (ed.), The State of Sociology, Beverly Hills CA: Sage, 1983.
  • 5Richard Whitley, Black- boxism and the Sociology of Science, Sociological Review 18,1972.
  • 6David Bloor, Knowledge and Sodal Imagery, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991.
  • 7Barry Barnes, Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory ,London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.
  • 8巴里·巴恩斯,大卫·布鲁尔,约翰·亨利:科学知识:一种社会学的分析[M],南京:南京大学出版社,2004.
  • 9Andrew Pikering, Mangle of Practie, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • 10Kaplan N, Sociology of Science., in Handbook of Modern Sociology, edited by Robert E L Faris, 1964.

二级参考文献21

  • 1[1]Ben-David, J. 1971. The Scientist's Role in Society: A Comparative Analysis. Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • 2[2]Cole, J. R. & S. Cole 1973. Social Stratification in Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • 3[3]Cole, S. 1975. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. in L. Coser (ed.), The Idea of Social Structure:Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: 175-220.
  • 4[4]Cole, S. 1992. Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • 5[5]Cole, S. & H. Zuckerrnan 1964. Inventory of Empirical and Theoretical Studies of Anomie. in M.Clinard (ed.), Anomie and Deviant Behavior. New York: The Free Press: 243-313.
  • 6[6]Feuer, L. 1963. The Scientific Intellectual. New York: Basic Books.
  • 7[7]Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • 8[8]Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • 9[9]Merton, R. K. 1938a. Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review. 3: 672-82.
  • 10[10]Merton, R. K. 1938b. Science, Society, and Technology in Seventeenth Century England. in G.Sarton (ed.), OSIRIS: Studies on the History and Philosophy of Science and on the History of Learning and Culture. Bruges: The St Catherine Press: 362-632.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部