期刊文献+

父母元情绪理念、情绪表达与儿童社会能力的关系 被引量:63

Relations among Parental Meta-Emotion Philosophy, Parental Emotion Expressivity, and Children's Social Competence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对341名学前儿童及其父母进行问卷调查,考察父母元情绪理念、情绪表达与儿童社会能力的直接与间接关系。结果表明:(1)父亲情绪教导对儿童社会能力有促进作用,而情绪紊乱对儿童社会能力有阻碍作用;父亲的积极情绪表达对儿童社会能力有促进作用,消极情绪表达则有负向作用;此外,父亲情绪教导、情绪紊乱除了对儿童社会能力具有直接作用外,还通过其情绪表达对儿童社会能力具有间接影响。(2)母亲情绪教导对儿童社会能力具有积极作用,而情绪紊乱则具有消极影响;母亲积极情绪表达对儿童社会能力有促进作用,而消极情绪表达对儿童社会能力无显著预测关系;母亲情绪教导通过其积极情绪表达对儿童社会能力具有间接促进作用。 Parental meta-emotion philosophy refers to parents' feelings and behaviors toward their own and their children's emotions. It reflects parental beliefs about emotion socialization. Research has indicated that maternal positive meta-emotion philosophy (e.g. emotion coaching) is associated with children's emotional competence, social competence and that maternal negative meta-emotion philosophy (etc. emotion dismissing) is related with children's behavior problem. However, little research has been conducted on paternal recta-emotion philosophy. Moreover, there is inadequate research on parental emotion noninvolvement and emotion dysfunction. It has been suggested that children's competence may be a mediator of the relations between parental emotion socialization belief or goal and children's social outcomes. It is also reasonable to argue that parents' beliefs or goals about emotion may also affect their own emotion-related behavior and emotion expressivity. As such, parental emotion expressivity may play a mediated role in relations between parental emotion-related beliefs and children's social competence. The current study explored relations among parental meta-emotion philosophy, emotion expressivity, and children's social competence. We hypothesized that parental emotion expressivity would mediate the relations between parental meta-emotion philosophy and children's social competence. Three hundred and forty one children aged 3-5 years and their parents participated in the study. Child social competence was assessed using the Early School Behavior Rating Scale reported by mothers. Fathers and mothers reported their own emotion expressivity using the Self-Expressiveness in the Family Questionnaire and meta-emotion philosophy using the Parental Meta-Emotion Philosophy Scale. Multiple regression analyses and path analyses revealed the following results. First, paternal emotion coaching philosophy was positively associated with children's social competence, and paternal emotion dysfunction philosophy was negatively associated with children's social competence. Paternal positive expressivity was positively associated with children's social competence whereas paternal negative emotional expressivity was negatively associated with children's social competence. Paternal positive and negative emotion expressivity mediated relations between paternal emotion coaching and children's social competence. In addition, paternal negative emotion expressivity mediated relations between paternal emotion dysfunction and children's social competence. Second, maternal emotion coaching philosophy was positively associated with children's social competence, and maternal emotion dysfunctional philosophy was negatively associated with children's social competence. Further, maternal positive emotional expressivity was positively associated with children's social competence, but negative emotional expressivity was not associated with children's social competence. The relation between maternal emotion coaching and children's social competence was mediated by maternal emotion expressivity. These results indicated that parental emotion-related beliefs or goals not only were directly associated with children's social competence, but also had indirect effects on children's social competence through emotion-related reflection and behavior.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期199-210,共12页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 教育部人文社会科学一般项目青年基金(10YJCXLX026) 东南大学自然科学基金预研项目(9250180012)
关键词 学前儿童 父母元情绪理念 父母情绪表达 社会能力 中介效应 preschoolers, parental meta-emotion philosophy, parental emotion expressivity, social competence, mediating effects.
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Boyum, L. A., & Parke, R. D. (1995). The role of family emotional expressiveness in the development of children's social competence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(3), 593-608.
  • 2Chaplin, T. M., Cole, P. M., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2005). Parental socialization of emotion expression: Gender differences and relations to child adjustment. Emotion, 5(1), 80-88.
  • 3Chen, X. Y., & French, D. C. (2008). Children's social competence in cultural context. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 591-616.
  • 4Denham, S. A. (2010). Emotional competence in preschoolers: Implications for social functioning. In J. Luby (Ed.), Handbook of preschool mental health: Development, disorders, and treatment. New York: Guildford (In press).
  • 5Denham, S. A., & Burton, R. (2003). Social and emotional prevention and intervention programming for preschoolers. NewYork: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • 6Dunn, J., & Brown, J. R. (1994). Attect expression in the family, children's understanding of emotions, and their interactions with others. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40(1), 120-137.
  • 7Denham, S. A., Blair, K. A., DeMulder, E., Levitas, J., Sawyer, K., Auerbach-Major, S., et al. (2003). Preschool emotional competence: Pathway to social competence. Child Development, 74(1), 238-256.
  • 8Denham, S. A., & Grout, L. (1993). Socialization of emotion: Pathway to preschoolers' emotional and social competence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17(3), 205-227.
  • 9Denham, S. A., Mitchell-Copeland, J., Strandberg, K., Auerbach, S., & Blair, K. (1997). Parental contributions to preschoolers' emotional competence: Direct and indirect effects. Motivation and Emotion, 21(1), 65-86.
  • 10Denham, S. A., Workman, E., Cole, P. M., Weissbrod, C., Kendziora, K. T., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2000). Prediction of externalizing behavior problems from early to middle childhood: The role of parental socialization and emotion expression. Development and Psychopathology, 12(1), 23-45.

二级参考文献20

  • 1王秋娟,高洪深.北京市城镇居民收入差距研究[J].北方工业大学学报,2005,17(4):11-15. 被引量:3
  • 2[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 3[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 4[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 5[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 6[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 7[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 8[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 9[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64
  • 10[11]Clogg C C, Petkova E, Shihadeh E S. Statistical methods for analyzing collapsibility in regression models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(1): 51~74

共引文献7710

同被引文献656

引证文献63

二级引证文献465

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部