期刊文献+

2×4矫治器配合下后牙面树脂垫治疗乳前牙反的临床研究 被引量:1

Treatment effects of 2×4 appliance with posterior occlusal acrylic blocks in correction of deciduous anterior crossbites
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨2×4矫治器配合下后牙面树脂垫早期阻断矫治乳前牙反的临床效果。方法乳牙期前牙反患者46例,平均年龄(4.2±0.6)岁,采用2×4矫治器配合下后牙面树脂垫高咬合进行早期阻断矫治。配对t检验比较头颅定位侧位片的牙、颌、面测量值在矫治前后的差异。结果矫治后所有患者乳前牙反解除。与矫治前相比,上中切牙角(UA-SN)增加11.57°(P<0.001),上牙弓长度(is-ms)增加2.26 mm(P<0.01);下中切牙角(LA-MP)减小4.38°(P<0.01),下牙弓长度(ii-mi)减少1.04 mm(P<0.01)。ANB增大1.44°。结论 2×4矫治器配合下后牙面树脂垫是早期阻断矫治乳前牙反的有效方法,患儿易于配合。 Objective The purposes of this study were to investigate the outcome of early interceptive treatment of deciduous anterior crossbites with a 2×4 appliance and posterior occlusal acrylic resin blocks,and to examine the changes of dentofacial morphology after treatment.Methods Forty-six(17 males,29 females;4.2±0.6 years old) subjects with deciduous anterior crossbites were treated with a 2×4 appliance and posterior occlusal acrylic resin blocks.Lateral cephalograms were obtained before and immediately after treatment.The differences in the cephalometric characteristics were compared using a paried t-test.Results All subjects obtained a positive overjet after active treatment of about6 months.UA-SN increased 11.57°(P0.001);is-ms increased 2.26 mm(P0.01);LA-MP decreased 4.38°(P0.01);ii-mi decreased 1.04 mm(P0.01).ANB increased 1.44°(P0.01).Conclusion Posterior bite raising and 2×4 appliance therapy are effective interceptive treatments of deciduous anterior crossbites.The young children are cooperative during the treatment period.After treatment the retroclined upper incisors that may cause dental interference during the path of closure of the mandible were proclined.And the lower incisors were tipped lingually to achieve normal overjet which might provide a favorable environment for the maxillary growth.
出处 《广东牙病防治》 2012年第1期14-18,共5页 Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment
关键词 乳牙[合] 乳前牙反牙[合] 2×4矫治器 Deciduous dentition Deciduous anterior crossbites 2×4 appliance
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1王祖华,史宗道,佘秉钺,秦君成,郭洪亮,漆琳,祝瑛.乳前牙反的追踪观察研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1999,17(4):348-351. 被引量:9
  • 2Nagahara K,Suzuki T,Nakamura S.Longitudinal changes in theskeletal pattern of deciduous anterior crossbite.Angle Orthod,1997,67(6):439-446.
  • 3Deguchi T,Kanomi R,Ashizawa Y,et al.Very early face masktherapy in ClassⅢchildren.Angle Orthod,1999,69(4):349-355.
  • 4Campbell PM.The dilemma of ClassⅢtreatment early or late?An-gle Orthod,1983,53(3):175-191.
  • 5Baccetti T,Franchi L,McNamara JA.Cephalometric variables pre-dicting the long-term success or failure of combined rapid maxillaryexpansion and facial mask therapy.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,2004,126(1):16-22.
  • 6Nagahara K,Murata S,Nakamura S,et al.Prediction of the perma-nent dentition in deciduous anterior crossbite.Angle Orthod,2001,71(5):390-395.
  • 7Rabie AB,Gu Y.Management of pseudo ClassⅢmalocclusion insouthern Chinese children.Br Dent J,1999,186(4):183-187.
  • 8ChangHP,KinoshitaZ,KawamotoT.Cranifacialpattern ofClassⅢdeciduous dentition.Angle Orthod,1992,62(2):139-144.
  • 9贾绮林,王海岚,王以玲.前方牵引对于乳牙期骨性Ⅲ类错he牙颌结构的影响[J].口腔正畸学,2003,10(4):156-159. 被引量:54
  • 10Baccetti T,Tollaro I.A retrospective comparison of functional ap-pliance treatment of ClassⅢmalocclusion in the deciduous andmixed dentitions.Eur J Orthod,1998,20(4):309-317.

二级参考文献22

共引文献62

同被引文献11

  • 1Campbell P M. The dilemma of Class III treatment early or late [J].? Angle Orthod, 1983,53: 175-191.
  • 2Moyers R E. Handbook of Orthodontics [M]. 4th ed. Chicago,Ⅲ: The Year Book Publishers Inc: 1988,410-418.
  • 3Chang H P, Kinoshita Z, Kawamoto T. Cranifacial pattern of Class III deciduous dentition[J]. Angle Orthod' 1992,62:139-144.
  • 4Tollaro I, Baccetti T, Bassarelli V, et al. Class III malocclusion in the deciduous dentition: a morphological and correlation study Eli. Eur J Orthod, 1994, 16: 401-408.
  • 5Tsai HH. Components of anterior crossbite in the primary dentition [J]. ASDC J Dent Child 2001 : 68 (1) : 27-32.
  • 6Choi H J, Kim J Y, Yoo S E,et al. Cephalometric characteristics of Korean children with Class III malocclusion in the deciduous denti- tion [J]. Angle Orthod, 2010, 80: 86-90.
  • 7Nagahara K, Suzuki T, Nakamura S. Longitudinal changes in the skeletal pattern of deciduous anterior crossbite [J]. Angle Orthod, 1997,67: 439-446.
  • 8Deguchi T, Kanomi R, Ashizawa Y, et al. Very early face mask thera-py in Class Ⅲ children[J]. Angle Orthod, 1999,69: 349-355.
  • 9Ge Y,Liu J,Guo X,et al. A follow-up study of early interceptive treatment of primary anterior erossbites [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2011 (5), 33: 551-557.
  • 10Mouakeh M. Cephalometric evaluation of eraniofacial pattern of Syri- an children with Class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofaeial Orthop, 2001 : 119: 640-649.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部