期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

宫颈冷刀锥切术与宫颈环形电切术在宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗中疗效比较 被引量：4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析并比较宫颈上皮内瘤变的两种治疗方法:宫颈冷刀锥切术和宫颈环形电切的疗效,减低阳性切缘发生率。方法从患者年龄、孕产次、分娩方式、CIN分级等几个维度来对患者接受的CKC和LEEP治疗进行回顾性分析,通过其术后阳性切缘的比例来进行比较。结果本研究选取了100名CIN患者,从50名接受CKC治疗和50名接受LEEP治疗的临床数据发现,患者CIN分级、分娩方式、孕产次造成的阳性切缘在两组治疗之间差异不显著,而患者年龄对于两组治疗有着显著性的差异,年龄>50岁的患者接受CKC治疗后的阳性切缘发生率比接受LEEP治疗的低37.5%。另外,经多元logistic回归分析,年龄>50岁的患者进行LEEP治疗术后有阳性切缘的隐患。结论 CKC是年龄>50岁的CIN患者最可靠最有保障的治疗方式。
作者 蒋敏桥 叶艳娜 梁见弟
机构地区 广东省东莞市人民医院妇产科
出处 《当代医学》 2012年第7期37-38,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 宫颈上皮内瘤变 宫颈冷刀锥切 宫颈环形电切 患者年龄
分类号 R737.33 [医药卫生—肿瘤]
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Lu CH,Liu FS,Tseng JJ,et al.Predictive factors for residual diseasein subsequent hysterectomy following conization for CIN III[J].Gynecol Oncol,2000,79:284.
  • 2Lu CH,Liu FS,Kuo CJ,et al.Prediction of persistence or recurrenceafter conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III[J].Obstet Gynecol,2006,107:830.
  • 3周明,马小玲,张玉泉.宫颈上皮内瘤样变锥切术后残留/复发的研究现状[J].中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(9):536-538. 被引量：12
  • 4Keating JT,Wang HH.Significance of a diagnosis of atypical squamouscells of undetermined significance for Papanicolaou smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women[J].Cancer Cytopathol,2001,93:100.
  • 5Mohamed-Noor K,Quinn MA,Tan J.Outcomes after cervical cold knife conization with complete and incomplete excision of abnormal epithelium:A review of 699 cases[J].Gynecol Oncol,1997,67:34.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Gecchini S, Carozzi F, Confortini M, et al. Persistent human papilloma virus infection as an indicator of risk of recurrence of high-grade cervical intraepithdial neoplasia treated by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure [J]. Tumori, 2004, 90 (2):225～228.
  • 2Houfflin Debarge V, Collinet P, Vinatier D, et al. Value of human papillomavirus testing after conization by loop dectrosurgical excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2003, 90(3): 587～592.
  • 3Nagai N, Mukai K, Oshita T, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA status after loop excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade Ⅲ-A prospective study [J]. Int J Mol Med, 2004, 13(4): 589～593.
  • 4Alonso I, Torne A, Puig-Tintore LM, et al. Pre- and postconization high-risk HPV testing predicts residual/recurrent disease in patients treated for GIN 2-3[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2006, 103 (2): 631～636.
  • 5Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, et al. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 189(1):295～304.
  • 6Natee J, Therasakvichaya S, Boriboonhirunsam D. Prevalence and risk factors for residual cervical neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP or conization [J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2005, 88(10): 1344～1348.
  • 7Lu CH, Liu FS, Kuo CJ, et al. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅲ [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107(4): 830～835.
  • 8Dietrich CS 3rd, Yancey MK, Miyazawa K, et al. Risk factors for early cytologic abnormalities after loop electrosurgical excision procedure[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 99(2): 188～192.
  • 9Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Ratchusiri K. Clinicopathologic predictors of incomplete excision after loop electrosurgical excision for cervical preneoplasia [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2005, 6(4): 481～484.
  • 10Brockmeyer AD, Wright JD, Gao F, et al. Persistent and recurrent cervical dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedure [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 192(5): 1379～1381.

共引文献11

同被引文献30

二级引证文献15

当代医学
2012年 第7期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部