期刊文献+

基于模糊随机模拟的后寨河岩溶泉流量衰减风险 被引量:2

Depletion risk assessment of discharge of Houzhaihe karst spring based on coupling method of stochastic simulation with triangular fuzzy numbers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对贵州省后寨河岩溶泉流域泉流量与降水时间序列的动态分析,首先模拟了不同降水条件下泉流量的衰减过程线,建立了枯季泉流量与前期降水量之间的数学表达式,然后采用蒙特卡罗方法,利用随机模拟与三角模糊数耦合模型,进行泉流量衰减风险分析研究,得到了泉流量的概率分布.结果表明,泉流量小于0.1 m3/s的概率为43.5%.建议采取防范措施,以降低当地泉流量衰减的风险. Based on dynamic analysis of the time series of spring discharge and precipitation in the Houzhaihe karst spring basin in Guizhou Province, depletion curves of the spring discharge under different precipitation conditions were simulated and mathematical functions for the spring discharge in dry seasons and antecedent precipitation were established. The Monte-Carlo method and the coupling method of stochastic simulation with triangular fuzzy numbers were used to conduct the depletion risk assessment of the spring discharge, based on which the probability distribution of the spring discharge was obtained. The results show that the probability for the spring discharge of less than 0.01 m^3/s was 43.5%. It is suggested that preventive measures should be taken to reduce the depletion risk of spring discharge in the study area.
出处 《河海大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期113-117,共5页 Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences)
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2006CB403204)
关键词 泉流量衰减 风险分析 蒙特卡罗方法 随机模拟 三角模糊数 depletion of spring discharge risk assessment Monte-Carlo method stochastic simulation triangular fuzzy numbers
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献40

共引文献178

同被引文献19

  • 1陈洪元,陈邦宇,陈波.贵州省普定后寨岩溶小流域水文特性研究[J].贵州地质,2005,22(4):284-288. 被引量:21
  • 2Labat D, Abahou R, Mangin A. Rainfall-runoff relations for karstic springs. Part I: Convolution and spectral analyses.[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2000, 238:123--148.
  • 3Labat D, Ababou R, Mangin A. Linear and nonlinear input/ output models for karstic springflow and flood prediction at dif ferent time scales[J].Stochastic Environmental Research ~.. Risk Assessment, 1999, 13(5):337 364.
  • 4Yue S, Hashino M. Unit hydrographs to model quick and slow runoff components of streamflow [J].Journal of Hydrology, 2000, 227(1/4) :195--206.
  • 5Bonacei O. Karst springs hydrographs as indicators of karst aq uifers[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 1993, 38(1):51 62.
  • 6Dreiss S J. Linear unit-response functions as indicators of re charge areas for large karst springs[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1983, 61(1):31--44.
  • 7Dreiss S J. Regional scale transport in a karst aquifer: 1. Com- ponent separation of spring flow hydrographs[J].Water Re-source Research, 1989, 25 (1): 117 125.
  • 8Eisenlohr L, Bouzelboudjen M, Kirdly, L, et al. Numerical versus statistical modelling of natural response of a karst hydrogeological system[J].Journal of Hydrology, 1992, 202: 244--262.
  • 9Denic Jukic V, Jukic D. Composite transfer functions for karst aquifers[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 200a, 274(1):80--94.
  • 10沈振中,陈雰,赵坚.岩溶管道与裂隙交叉渗流特性试验研究[J].水利学报,2008,39(2):137-145. 被引量:18

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部