期刊文献+

食管癌新辅助化疗的Meta分析 被引量:4

Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:用系统评价的方法对新辅助化疗治疗食管癌的疗效进行评估,从而为临床决策提供参考。方法:计算机检索PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,中国期刊全文数据库,中国生物医学文献数据库,中文科技期刊数据库等资源,搜集2010-04前发表的有关新辅助化疗治疗食管癌的随机对照试验(RCTs),按Cochrane系统评价手册5.0.2的文献质量评价办法评价纳入研究的方法学质量,而后提取有效数据并采用RevMan 5.0.17软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入11个随机对照试验,包括2 343例患者。Meta分析结果显示,与单纯手术性比,新辅助化疗可以提高根治切除率〔RR=1.12,95%CI(1.04~1.22)〕和5年生存率〔RR=1.39,95%CI(1.15~1.68)〕而两组间3年生存率〔RR=1.18,95%CI(0.94~1.49)〕、疾病进展时间〔MD=0.61,95%CI(-4.87~6.10)〕及术后并发症差异无统计学意义〔RR=1.21,95%CI(0.83~1.76)〕。结论:食管癌术前进行新辅助化疗可以提高根治切除率和5年生存率,使患者受益。 OBJECTIVE:To compare the effectiveness and adverse of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.METHODS:PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,Chinese Biomedical Literature Database,China Journal Full Text Database were searched and references of the included studies up to April 2010.Randomized controlled trials involving neoadjvant chemotherapy plus surgery and surgery alone for esophageal cancer.Study selection,data collection and quality assessment of studies were performed by two individual reviewers according to the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.0.2.Statistic analysis were calculated using RevMan5.0.17software.RESULTS:Eleven randomized controlled trails,a total of 2 343patients were involved.There were significant differences in resection rate 〔 RR=1.12,95%CI(1.04-1.22)〕 and 5year survival rate 〔 RR=1.39,95%CI(1.15-1.68)〕 No statistical different in 3year survival rate 〔 RR=1.18,95%CI(0.94-1.49)〕,Time to progression 〔 MD=0.61,95%CI(-4.87-6.10)〕 and complications of surgery [ RR=1.21,95%CI(0.83-1.76)].CONCLUSION:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery can benefit patients by raising the R0resection rate and 5year survival rate.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2011年第23期1864-1869,共6页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 食管肿瘤 新辅助化疗 META分析 esophageal neoplasms neoadjuvant chemotherapy Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Kamangar F,Dores GM,Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer inci-dence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents:defining priorites to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic re- gions of the world[J]. J Clin 0ncol,2006,24(14):2137-2150.
  • 2Day NE, Varghese C. Oesophageal cancer[J].Cancer Surv, 1994, 19-20:43-54.
  • 3Parkin DM, Muir CS. Cancer incidence in five continents, com- parability and quality of data[J].IARC SCI PubI, 1992, (120) : 45-173.
  • 4Munoz N, Day NE. Esophageal Cancer. In cancer epidemiology and prevention, 2nd ed[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996~ 681-706.
  • 5Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistic,2008[J]. CA Cancer J C1in,2008,58(2) :71 -96.
  • 6Mariette C, Finzi L, Fabre S, et al. Factots predictive of com- plete resection ofoperable esophageal cancer: A prospective study[J]. AnnThoracSurg, 2003,75(6):1720-1726.
  • 7郝永光.多西他赛化疗联合放疗治疗食管癌临床观察[J].山东医药,2010,50(42):76-77. 被引量:5
  • 8Sehlag PM. Randomized trial of preoperative chemotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the esophagus[J]. Arch Surg, 1992,127 (12) : 1446-1450.
  • 9彭彦.局部晚期食管癌术前新辅助化疗的临床研究[J].中国民康医学,2008,20(13):1419-1420. 被引量:2
  • 10Kelsen DP, Winter KA, Gunderson L,et al. Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113) : a random assign- ment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery com- pared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(24) :3719-3725.

二级参考文献38

共引文献62

同被引文献54

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部