期刊文献+

两种手术治疗四部分肱骨近端骨折的对比研究 被引量:7

Comparative Research of the Outcomes after Two Different Methods for Treatment of Four-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨与分析切开复位钢板内固定和人工肱骨头置换两种不同手术方案治疗四部分肱骨近端骨折的适应证和早期疗效。方法对48例四部分肱骨近端骨折进行切开复位钢板内固定和人工肱骨头置换术,术后6周、3个月及半年时进行随访,关节功能应用美国肩肘外科医师协会评分(rating scale of the American shoulder and elbowsurgeons,ASES)、Constant-Murley评分及美国加州大学肩关节成形改良评分(scoring system modification for hemi-arthroplasty of UCLA,UCLA-SSMH),并对关节活动度及满意度进行评定。结果术后6周时人工关节置换组肩关节功能明显优于切开复位钢板内固定组,3个月及半年时两组肩关节功能无统计学差异。所有48例患者术后半年时ASES评分平均(72.26±10.18)分,Constant-Murley评分平均(72.15±11.63)分,UCLA-SSMH评分平均(23.54±3.89)分,视觉模拟疼痛评分平均(1.52±1.11)分,肩关节前屈上举(124.90±27.14)°,外举(89.62±23.05)°,外旋(21.56±4.51)°,内旋达L2~L3,对疼痛满意度为95.8%,日常功能活动满意度为87.5%。结论对于四部分肱骨近端骨折,切开复位钢板内固定和人工肱骨头置换术均可取得较满意的结果。人工肱骨头置换组可较早获得满意的肩关节功能。 Objective To investigate indications and early results in the treatment of four-part proximal humerus fractures with open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF) with plate and humeral head replacement.Methods Forty-eight patients who received ORIF with plate and humeral head replacement were followed up.ASES score,Constant-Murley score,UCLA-SSMH score,range of motion and satisfaction rate had been adopted for evaluating the shoulder function at the time of 6 weeks,3 months and half a year after the operation.Results The shoulder function of humeral head replacement group was superior to ORIF group at 6 weeks after operation.At 3 months or half a year after the operation,the shoulder function had no statistically significant difference between the two groups.The mean ASES score was(72.26±10.18),Constant-Murley score was(72.15±11.63),UCLA-SSMH score was(23.54±3.89),VAS score was(1.52±1.11);The mean forward flexion was(124.90±27.14)°,abduction was(89.62±23.05)°,external rotation was(21.56±4.51)°,internal rotation was up to L2~L3 level at half a year after the operation.The total satisfaction rate for pain relief was 95.8%,and functional recovery was 87.5%.Conclusion For the treatment of four-part proximal humerus fractures,satisfactory results could both be obtained in ORIF with plate and humeral head replacement.Patients who received humeral head replacement could make an earlier recovery.
作者 陆军 邹天明
出处 《实用骨科杂志》 2012年第2期115-117,共3页 Journal of Practical Orthopaedics
关键词 肱骨近端骨折 钢板内固定 肱骨头置换 早期疗效 proximal humerus fractures internal fixation humeral head replacement early results
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Krishnan SG, Lin KC, Burkhead WZ, et al. 'Pins, plates, and prostheses':current concepts in treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus [J]. Cur rent Opinion in Orthopaedics, 2007,18 (4) : 380-385.
  • 2Ross Henshaw D, Murthi AM, Levine WN. Percuta neous Pins versus ORIF,or is HHR Better[J]. Current Opinion in Orthopaedics ,2001,12(4) :307-314.
  • 3Hettrich CM ,Weldon E 3rd ,Boorman RS,et al. Pre operative factors associated with improvements in shoulder function after humeral hemiarthroplasty [J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2004, 86 (7): 1446-1451.
  • 4Milgrom C, Schaffler M,Gilbert S,et al. Rotator-cuff changes in a symptomatic adults. The effect of age, hand dominance and gender [J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1995,77(2) :296-298.
  • 5Michael K, Miriam J, Bernd H, et al. Treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients with the Delta nl reverse shoulder prosthesis[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2008,22 (10) : 698-704.
  • 6Naranja R J, Iannotti JP. Displaced three and four part proximal humerus fracture :evaluation and management [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2000,8 (6): 373-382.
  • 7周蔚,罗从风,翟伟韬,张长青,曾炳芳.锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(1):1-3. 被引量:76
  • 8韩本松,范存义,曾炳芳.复杂性肱骨近端骨折的外科治疗[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(20):1545-1547. 被引量:28
  • 9姜春岩,王满宜,荣国威.人工肱骨头置换治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折[J].中华外科杂志,2003,41(9):649-653. 被引量:56

二级参考文献37

  • 1张殿英,杨明,徐海林,傅中国,姜保国.LCP治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(14):1055-1057. 被引量:42
  • 2Williams GR Jr,Wong KL.Two-part and three-part fracture:open reduction and internal fixation versus close reduction and percutanrous pinning.Orthop Clin North (Am),2000,31:1.
  • 3Naranja RJ Jr,Iannotti JP.Displaced three and four part proximal humerus fracture:evaluation and management.Jam Acad Orthop Surg,2000,8:373.
  • 4Misra A,Kapur R,Maffulli N.Complex proximal humerus in adults a systematic review of management.Injury,2001,32:363.
  • 5Lill H,Josten C.Proximal and distal humerus fracture in advanced age.Orthopade,2000,29 (4):327.
  • 6Hintermann B,Trouillier HH,Sehitfer. Rigid internal fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus in older patients[ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br) ,2000,82:1107 - 1111.
  • 7Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) , 1970,52 : 1077 - 1089.
  • 8Whgman MD,Roolker W,Patt TW, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus[ J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) ,2002, 84 : 1919 - 1925.
  • 9Elkowitz, Stuart J, Koval. Decision making for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures [ J ]. Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery.2002,3(4) :234 -250.
  • 10Cameron, Brian D, Gerald R. Operative fixation of three-part proximal humerus fractures [ J ]. Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery.2002,3(2) :111 - 123.

共引文献156

同被引文献61

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部