摘要
认知思维与情动思维是司法过程中前后相继的两种思维方式,它们在形成裁判结果的机制中行使着不同的职能,并且前者在裁判中必然要向后者发生转换。但是,法官必须对此种转换之程序、原则和结果予以合理性论证,否则,易遭受裁判恣意之诟病。
There are two thinking ways of cognitive and feeling that are end to end in judicial process, which exercise different functions in the mechanism of formation judicial result. Furthermore, the former converts inevitably to the latter during judgment. But a judge had to rationality this kind of conversion of the procedures, principles and results, otherwise is liable to suffer this denounce of unbridled judgment.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第2期132-137,共6页
Legal Forum
基金
作者主持的江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究指导项目<法学方法论之本真>(2010SJD820014)的阶段性成果
关键词
认知思维
情动思维
司法裁判
合理性论证
cognitive thinking
feeling thinking
judicial adjudication
rationality
