期刊文献+

按摩联合电刺激法治疗痉挛型脑瘫患儿的效果及护理 被引量:2

Nursing and effect of massage jointing electrical stimulation method on the therapy for spastic cerebral palsy children
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨头面部与四肢按摩联合电刺激法对痉挛型脑瘫患儿的治疗效果及护理。方法将42例痉挛型脑瘫患儿按随机数字法分为对照组19例和治疗组23例,对照组给予常规康复训练及药物治疗;治疗组在常规康复训练基础上使用头面部与四肢按摩联合电刺激法治疗,同时给予规范的康复护理指导。两组患儿采用发育筛查测验法(DST)测试其智力指数(MT)、发育商(DQ)及粗大运动功能试验量表(GMFM)的评估,比较两组患儿的治疗效果。结果治疗组患儿治疗后MT、DQ和GMFM评分分别为(79.28±2.20)、(73.44±1.21)、(36.25±4.66)分高于治疗前(71.24±2.22)、(65.07±2.54)、(23.14±4.41)分,两者比较差异有统计学意义(t分别为-13.57,~17.96,0.82;P〈0.01);同时,与对照组治疗后评分(72.14±2.09)、(68.24±1.98)、(28.65±4.85)分相比,差异有统计学意义(t分别为8.04,7.85,3.84;P〈0.01);对照组患儿治疗后MT、DQ评分较治疗前增加,但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗组总有效率为69.67%高于对照组总有效率36.84%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(X^2=4.497,P〈0.05)。结论头面部与四肢按摩联合电刺激法对痉挛性脑瘫患儿有较好的疗效,值得推广运用。 Objective To explore the nursing and effect of massage on head,facial and limbs jointing electrical stimulation method on the therapy for spastic cerebral palsy children. Methods The table of random number was used and forty-two spastic cerebral palsy children were divided into control group( n = 19 cases)and treatment group(n =23 cases), conventional rehabilitation training and medical therapy were adopted in control group, on this basic, massage on head,facial and limbs jointing electrical stimulation method and rehabilitation nursing care guilligences were adopted in treatment group. Development screening test method (DST) was used to tested Intelligence index (MT) and Development business ( DQ), Gross motor function test scale (GMFM) was also used, then effects of therapy was compared . Results The score of MT, DQ and GMFMin treatment group after received therapy respectively was (79.28 ± 2.20), (73.44 ± 1.21 ), (36.25 ± 4.66), respectively, higher than that ( 71.24 ± 2.22), ( 65.07 ± 2.54), ( 23.14 ± 4.41 ) before therapy, and the difference was statistically significant(t = -13.57, -17.96,8. 82, respectively;P 〈 0. 01 ), then compared with scores in control group received therapy that was(72.14 ± 2.09 ), (68.24 ± 1.98 ), (28.65 ± 4.85 ), the difference was statistically significant(t =8. 04,7. 85,3. 84,respectively;P 〈0. 01 ). There was no significant difference on the MT,DQ score in control group before and after received therapy ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The effective rate of therapy in treatment group was 69.67% higher than that of control group 36.84%, and the difference was statistically significant (X^2 =4.497 ,P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions The therapy method of massage on head, facial and limbs jointing electrical stimulation is an effective treatment for spastic cerebral palsy children and worthy of clinical use.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2012年第5期538-540,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 脑性瘫痪 儿童 按摩 电刺激疗法 护理 Cerebral palsy Children Massage Electrical stimulation method Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献46

  • 1黄忆梅,李秀霞,郑小敏,杨志,郑捷,杨志明.脑瘫患儿术后家庭康复护理指导[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2004,19(4):74-75. 被引量:8
  • 2史惟,王素娟,徐秀娟,杨红,施炳培.三种粗大运动评估方法在婴幼儿脑瘫中的应用研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2004,12(3):223-225. 被引量:23
  • 3颜华,张惠佳,喻佩君,段华林,覃蓉,周洪涛,胡继红,王跑球,刘志雄,苏珍辉,阳伟红,刘丽军.小脑电刺激治疗对脑性瘫痪患儿运动功能和智力发育的影响[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(33):7486-7487. 被引量:4
  • 4林庆.小儿脑瘫的定义、诊断条件及分型[J].中华儿科杂志,1989,27(3):162-162.
  • 5吴丽,王家勤.实用小儿康复医学[M].北京:中国人民出版社,1998:115.
  • 6中华人民共和国卫生部医政司.中国康复医学诊疗规范(上册)[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.178.
  • 7吴葵 常华 侯预立 等.脑瘫家庭康复教室[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社,1994.3-5.
  • 8中华人民共和国卫生部医政司.中国康复医学诊疗规范(下册)[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.73.
  • 9Russell D,Rosenbaum PL,Avery LM,eds.Gross motor function measure (GMFM-66 & GMFM-88) user's manual.London:Mac Keith,2002.30-123.
  • 10史惟,廖元贵,王素娟,等.GMFM66项在婴幼儿脑性瘫痪粗大运动评估中的信度和效度研究.2004年全国小儿脑性瘫痪专题研讨会论文汇编.昆明.2004.北京:中华医学会《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会.21-27.

共引文献126

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部