期刊文献+

量表编制中内容效度指数的应用 被引量:938

Content validity index in scale development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 内容效度是指一个量表实际测到的内容与所要测量的内容之间的吻合程度。量表内容效度的定量评价中应用最广泛的指标是内容效度指数。内容效度指数分为条目水平的内容效度指数(I-CVI)和量表水平的内容效度指数(S-CVI)两类。结合I-CVI,对随机一致性进行校正可计算调整后的kappa值(记为K*)。按计算方法不同,S-CVI分为全体一致S-CVI(S-CVI/UA)和平均S-CVI(S-CVI/Ave)。量表I-CVI不低于0.78,S-CVI/UA和S-CVI/Ave分别不低于0.8和0.9提示内容效度较好。在撰写相关论文时,应包含内容效度评价的过程和主要结果。 Content validity is the degree to which an instrument has an appropriate sample of items for the construct being measured and is an important procedure in scale development. Content validity index (CVI) is the most widely used index in quantitative evaluation. There are 2 kinds of CVI: I-CVI and S-CVI. A method to compute a modi ed kappa statistic (K * ) can be used to adjust I-CVI for chance agreement. S-CVI/UA and S-CVI/Ave are both scale level CVI with di erent formulas. Researchers recommend that a scale with excellent content validity should be composed of I-CVIs of 0.78 or higher and S-CVI/UA and S-CVI/Ave of 0.8 and 0.9 or higher, respectively. The characteristics and qualifications of the experts, process and main results of content validity evaluation should be reported in scale-related manuscript.
出处 《中南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期152-155,共4页 Journal of Central South University :Medical Science
关键词 量表 内容效度 内容效度指数 随机一致性 scale content validity content validity index chance agreement .
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409
  • 2Hoffman JIE.Congenital heart disease:incidence and inheritance.Ped Clin North Am,1990,37:25
  • 3Edward B.Genetics in congenital and acquired heart diease.Progr Pediatr Cardiol,1998,9:49
  • 4Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 5Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 6Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 7Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 8Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 9Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 10Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.

共引文献1

同被引文献6712

引证文献938

二级引证文献8018

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部