基于专利宽度和深度的技术复杂度分析被引量：20

The technology complexity based on patent width and depth

导出

摘要本文以Ozman M.提出的专利技术复杂度测度方法为基础,使用中国发明专利数据计算了三十个技术领域的宽度与深度,并与Ozman M.使用欧洲专利数据的计算结果进行了对比,从中发现各技术领域的技术复杂度在中国和欧洲表现出了趋同特性。电信领域前二十家公司在中国和欧洲的技术复杂度差异较大。日本电信类公司较美国和欧洲电信类公司拥有更高的技术宽度和深度,说明日本电信类公司拥有更复杂的专利技术。 Based on the measurement of patent complexity proposed by Ozman M.,the breadth and depth of 30 technology fields are analyzed by using Chinese invention patent data.The result is compared with the result of Ozman who analyzes the European patents.It is proved that the complexity of technology fields in both China and Europe are similar.The complexity of top 20 telecommunication corporations in China significantly differs with that in Europe.Japanese telecommunication corporations own greater technology breadth and depth than U.S.and European telecommunication corporations do,it is suggested that Japanese telecommunication corporations own more complex patents.

作者张古鹏陈向东牛欣

机构地区北京航空航天大学经济管理学院

出处《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期113-120,135,共9页 Science Research Management

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70772011)

关键词专利宽度专利深度技术复杂度分类号 patent breadth patent depth technology complexity IPC

分类号 G306.0 [文化科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Nesta,L.&Saviotti,P.Coherence of the Knowledge Base and Firm Innovative Performance:Evidence from the USPharmaceutical Industry[R].SPRU Electronic Working Pa-per Series,2004.
2Orsenigo,L.,Pammoli,F.,Riccaboni,M.,Bonaccorsi,A.&Turchetti,G.The Evolution of Knowledge and the Dy-namics of an Industry Network[J].Journal of Managementand Governance.1998,(1):147-175.
3Dosi,G,Hobday,M.Problem-solving Behaviour,Organi-zational Form and the Complexity of Tasks[R].Paper pre-pared for the Dynacom Project(European Union,DGXII,TS-ER)in collaboration with the UK Complex Product SystemsInnovation Centre,funded by the ESRC.Pisa/Brighton:StAnna School of Advanced Studies/SPRU,1999.
4Prencipe,A.Breadth and Depth of Technological Capabilitiesin the CoPS:The Case of the Aircraft Engine Control System[J].Research Policy.2000,29:895-911.
5Brusoni,S.,Prencipe,A.Unpacking the Black Box of Mod-ularity:Technologies,Products,Organizations[J].Industrialand Corporate Change.2000,(10):179-205.
6Ozman,M.Networks,Organizations and Knowledge[D].PhD thesis,MERIT,Maastricht University,2005.
7Cowan,R.,N.Jonard,Ozman,M.Knowledge Dynamics ina Network Industry[J].Technological Forecasting and SocialChange.2003,71:469-484.
8Brusoni,S.,Pavitt,K.,Prencipe,A.Knowledge Speciali-zation,Organizational Coupling,and the Boundaries of theFirm:Why Do Firms Know More Than They Make?[J].Ad-ministrative Science Quarterly,2001,26:597-621.
9Simon,H.A.The Architecture of Complexity,in The Sci-ences of the Artificial[M].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1969.
10Zander,U.,Kogut,B.Knowledge and the Speed of theTransfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities:AnEmpirical Test[J].Organization Science,1995,(6):76-92.