期刊文献+

我国刑罚轻缓化的经济分析——兼论罚金刑和自由刑的适用

Economic Implications of Mitigation of Penalty in China and the Application of Imprisonment and Fines
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刑罚轻缓化已经成为刑罚结构改革的总体趋势,通过对刑罚轻缓化的经济分析,我们可以挖掘出刑罚轻缓化背后深层次的原因,那就是"高概率的惩罚与轻刑化"的组合是预防和控制犯罪最为经济有效的方式,而轻刑化即我们所谓的刑罚轻缓化。在刑罚轻缓化的背景之下,透视罚金刑与自由刑的适用,我们可以发现罚金刑更符合刑罚轻缓化之意旨,应提升到主刑的地位,未来我国的刑罚结构改革也应以罚金刑为主导,而自由刑只起辅助的作用。 The mitigation of penalty has become a tendency of the reform of the penalty structure. Through an economic analysis of the mitigation of penalty, we see the real reason why we must mitigate the penalty. The combination of "high probability penalty and light punishment" is the best way to prevent and control the crime. With the background of mitigation of penalty, compared with imprisonment, fines fit the tenet of mitigation of penalty more. It should become the principal penalty. And fines should play a leading role in the penalty structure in the future, while imprisonment is only auxiliary.
作者 刘泉
机构地区 山东大学法学院
出处 《上海商学院学报》 2012年第1期81-85,共5页 Business Economic Review
关键词 刑罚轻缓化 威慑 效率 罚金刑 自由刑 mitigation of penalty, deterrence, efficiency, imprisonment, fine
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1[意]贝卡里亚.《论犯罪与刑罚》,黄风译,中国法制出版社2005年版,第16页.
  • 2Becker, G. , 1968, Crime and punishment : an economic approach, Journal of Political Economy, 76 : 169 - 217.
  • 3Corman, Hope and H. N. Mocan, 2000, A Time-Series Analysis of Crime, Deterrence, and Drug Abuse in New York City, American Economic Review, 90(3): 584-604.
  • 4Comwell, Christopher and Trumbull, William N. , 1994, Estimating the Economic Model of Crime with Panel Data, Review of Economics and Statistics (76:2, May) : 360 - 366.
  • 5Dezhbakhsh, H., Paul H. Rubin and Joanna M. Shepherd, 2003, Dose Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Postmoratorium Panel Data, American Law and Economics Review Vol. 5 ( 2 ) : 344 - 374.
  • 6Ehrlich, I. , 1973, Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation, The Journal of Political Economy, 81/3: 521 - 565.
  • 7Entorf, Horst and Hannes Spengler, 2000, Socio-economic and Demographic Factors of Crime in Germany: Evidence from Panel Data of the German States, International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 20:75 - 106.
  • 8Fajnzylber, P, D Lederman and N Loayza, 1998, Determinants of crime rates in Latin America and the world" World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Viewpoint Series Paper.
  • 9Imrohoroglu, Ayse. , Antonio Merlo and Peter Rupert, 2006, "Understanding the Determinants of Crime, Working Paper.
  • 10Kessler, D. and Levitt, Steven D. , 1999, Using Sentence Enhancements to Distinguish Between Deterrence and Incapacitation, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. XLII: 343 - 363.

共引文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部