摘要
经济分析表明,只有违约人承担全部的违约成本才能导致有效率的违约或履行决定,合理确定的因果关系限制下的违约责任能够实现这个目的。等价的必要条件决定了过于宽泛的因果关系,而对责任范围进行限制的法律因果关系则包含了过多的政策,掩盖了因果关系的客观性。应采用"NESS"规则来探究违约行为与损害事实之间的因果关系。
Economic analysis showed that efficient breach can be achieved only when defendant bears the full cost of breach of contract can. The liability for breach of contract limited by causal relationship can achieve this goal. The causality determined by equivalent necessary conditions is too broad. The legal cau sation limiting scope of responsibility contains too many policies and obscures the objectivity of causality. Therefore, we should use ＂NESS＇rules to explore the causal relationship between the breach and the dam age facts.
出处
《南京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》
2012年第1期49-54,共6页
Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics（Social Sciences）
基金
四川省教育厅基金项目(10SB058)
关键词
违约责任
因果关系
“NESS”
liability for breach of contract
causal relationship
＂NES＂
