期刊文献+

风险感知研究中的心理测量范式 被引量:38

Psychometric Paradigm in the Research of Risk Perception
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪下半叶以来,风险因素空前增加,风险类型不断变化,风险危害程度激增。人们生存意识空前自我反省,在不断博弈、挣扎和冲突过程中修正发展的路线和方向。心理测量范式是风险感知的心理学探索中最有影响的方法论技术和研究取向。它倡导通过表达性偏好的风险研究方法,描述风险的主观属性,解释风险感知的各类差异。在几十年发展中,心理测量范式进行了方法论意义上的技术拓展以及相关研究主题内容的深化。心理测量范式的理论空间仍有待加强,应该在更加全面理解风险感知性质的基础之上,充分实现有效的风险沟通。 Since the second half of thel900s, risk factors have been increasing unprecedentedly, and the types of risk have been changing continually. Moreover, the degree of hazards has also been on a sharp rise. In constant self reflections, struggles and conflicts, people modify their conception of their existence. Psycho metric paradigm is methodologically the most influential technique and research orientation in the psychological quest for risk perception. It advocates risk assessment of expressed preference, describing the subjective at tributes of risk and interpreting various differences of risk perception. In the past few decades, the psychomet- ric paradigm has not only witnessed an expansion in methodology but also gained deeper understanding of its research issues. However, there is still large theoretic space to explore for the psychometric paradigm. In particular, effective communication can be achieved only after we make a comprehensive understanding of the na- ture of risk perception.
作者 伍麟 张璇
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期95-102,共8页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学青年项目(08JCXLX006) 中央部属高校基本科研业务费项目(2010JC003)
关键词 风险 风险感知 心理测量范式 risk risk perception psychometric paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1谢晓非,徐联仓.一般社会情境中风险认知的实验研究[J].心理科学,1998,21(4):315-318. 被引量:39
  • 2Bohm,G.and H.R.Pfister,2000,“Action Tendencies and Characteristics of Environmental Risks”,Acta Psychologica,vol.104,pp.317-337.
  • 3Byrnes,J.P.,D.C.Miller and W.D.Schafer,1999,“Gender Differences in Risk Taking:A Meta-Analysis”,Psycho-logical Bulletin,vol.125,pp.367-383.
  • 4Douglas,M.,1985,Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences,New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
  • 5Earle,T.C.and M.K.Lindell,1984,“Public Perceptions of Industrial Risks:A Free-Response Approach”,in R.A.Waller and V.T.Covello(eds.),Low-Probability/High-Consequence Risk Analysis,New York:Plenum Press,pp.531-550.
  • 6Fischhoff,B.,et al.,1978,“How Safe is Safe enough?A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks andBenefits”,Policy Sciences,vol.9,pp.127-152.
  • 7Flynn,J.,P.Slovic and C.K.Mertz,1994,“Gender,Race,and Perception of Environmental Health Risks”,Risk Anal-ysis,vol.14,no.6,pp.1101-1108.
  • 8Gillian,H.and G.Rowe,2008,“A Characterisation of the Methodology of Qualitative Research on the Nature of PerceivedRisk:Trends and Omissions”,Journal of Risk Research,vol.11,no.5,p.617.
  • 9Hampel,J.,2006,“Different Concepts of Risk:A Challenge for Risk Communication”,International Journal of MedicalMicrobiology,vol.296,pp.5-10.
  • 10Karen,B.,2004,“Risk Perception Research:Socio-Cultural Perspectives on the Public Experience of Air Pollution”,En-vironment International,vol.30,no.6,pp.827-840.

二级参考文献1

共引文献38

同被引文献406

引证文献38

二级引证文献278

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部