期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术治疗宫颈癌20例临床分析 被引量:11

Clinical analysis of laparoscopy surgery in the treatment of cervical cancer:a report of 20 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下广泛子宫切除加盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗早期宫颈癌的临床疗效分析。方法对我院20例早期宫颈癌患者行腹腔镜下广泛子宫切除加盆腔淋巴结清扫术(TLRH+LPL组),并与同期20例经腹广泛子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ARH+APL组)的早期宫颈癌病例作为对照,比较两种术式术中、术后的情况及并发症等。结果 20例早期宫颈癌患者在腹腔镜下均顺利完成手术。TLRH+LPL组在术中出血量上与ARH+APL组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而两组的手术时间及切除的淋巴结数、淋巴结阳性率相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜技术治疗早期宫颈癌是安全可行的。 Objective To explore the clinical curative efficacy of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for the early cervical cancer.Methods Clinical data of 20 patients with early cervical cancer undergoing total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection(TLRH+LPL) were retrospectively reviewed.The other 20 patients were recruited as control group who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection(ARH+APL).Intraoperative and postoperative situations and complications in two groups were analyzed.Results All 20 patients successfully completed the operation under laparoscopy.The blood loss in TLRH+LPL group was significantly lower than that in ARH+APL group(P0.05).There was no significant difference between two groups in the mean operation time,numbers of dissected lymph nodes and positive rate of lymph node(P0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is safe and feasible for the early cervical cancer.
出处 《山西医科大学学报》 CAS 2012年第3期229-232,共4页 Journal of Shanxi Medical University
关键词 腹腔镜手术 广泛子宫切除 早期宫颈癌 laparoscopy total radical hysterectomy early cervical cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1Canis M, Mage G, Wattiez A, et al. Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri [J] .9 J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 1990, 19 (7) : 921.
  • 2Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type Ⅲ) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up [J] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 187 (2) : 340.
  • 3Obermair A, Ginbey P, Mc Cartney AJ. Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy [ J] . J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2003, 10 (3): 345.
  • 4Pomel C, Atallah D, Le Bouedec G, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer: 8 -year experience of a pilot study [J] . Gynecol Oncol, 2003, 91 (3) : 534.
  • 5Li G, Yan X, Shang H, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treat- ment of Ⅰb- Ⅱa cervical cancer [J] . Gynecol Oncol, 2007, 105 (1): 176.
  • 6Xu H, Chen Y, Li Y, et al. Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: experience based on 317 procedures [J] . Surg Endosc, 2007, 21 (6) : 960.
  • 7Uccella S, Laterza R, Ciravolo G, et al. A comparison of urinary complications following total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadeoectomy to open abdominal surgery [J] . GynecolOneol, 2007, 107 (1 suppl 1) : S147.
  • 8Puntambekar SP, Palep RJ, Puntambekar SS, et al. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique : our experience of 248 cases[J] . J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2007, 14 (6) : 682.
  • 9Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, etal. Feasibility, morbidity, and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy : our experience [J] . J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2007, 14 (5) : 584.
  • 10Frumovitz M, dos Reis R, Sun CC, et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early - stage cervical cancer[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 110 (1) : 96.

共引文献96

同被引文献83

  • 1钱晓蕾,王弓力.经阴道非脱垂全子宫切除152例临床分析[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(5):688-691. 被引量:5
  • 2李淑红.腹腔镜微创治疗与开腹手术治疗宫颈癌的临床探析[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2014,6(3):62-64. 被引量:6
  • 3吐尔逊阿依.艾尔肯,艾星子.艾里.广泛子宫切除加盆腔淋巴结清扫术对宫颈癌患者卵巢功能的影响[J].实用癌症杂志,2014,29(2):214-216. 被引量:6
  • 4梁志清.腹腔镜手术在妇科恶性肿瘤治疗中的应用价值[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(8):582-584. 被引量:19
  • 5袁宏.腹腔镜手术治疗早期子宫颈癌的近期疗效及临床应用价值[J].中国美容医学,2011,20(z4):45-46.
  • 6Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, et al.Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience[J].Ann Surg Oncol, 2009, 16 ( 5 ) : 1316-1323.
  • 7Lee E J, Kang H, Kim DH. A comparative study of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy for early- stage cervical cancer : a long-term follow-up study [ J ]. Eur J Ob- stet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2011,156( 1 ) :83.
  • 8Leblanc E,Narducci F,Frumovitz M,et al. Therapeutic value of pre- therapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma [J]. Gynecol Onco1,2009,105(2) :304.
  • 9Frumovitz M, dos Reis R, Sun CC, et al. Comparison of total lap- aroscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients withearly- stage cervical cancer[ J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010,110( 1 ) :96.
  • 10Beiner E,Hauspy M,Rosen F,et al. Radical vaginal trachefecto-my VS .radical hysterectomy for small eariy stage cervical cancer.A matched casecontrol study[J].Gynecol Oncol,2008,110(2): 167-171.

引证文献11

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部