期刊文献+

Design and operational considerations for selective catalytic reduction technologies at coal-fired boilers 被引量:13

Design and operational considerations for selective catalytic reduction technologies at coal-fired boilers
原文传递
导出
摘要 By the end of 2010, China had approximately 650 GW of coal-fired electric generating capacity producing almost 75% of the country's total electricity generation. As a result of the heavy reliance on coal for electricity generation, emissions of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), are increasing. To address these growing emissions, the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) has introduced new NOx emission control policies to encourage the installation of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technologies on a large number of coalfired electric power plants. There is, however, limited experience with SCR in China. It is therefore useful to explore the lessons from the use of SCR technologies in other countries. This paper provides an overview of SCR technology performance at coal-fired electric power plants demonstrating emission removal rates between 65% and 92%. It also reviews the design and operational challenges that, if not addressed, can reduce the reliability, performance, and cost-effectiveness of SCR technologies. These challenges include heterogeneous flue gas conditions, catalyst degradation, ammonia slip, sulfur trioxide (SO3) formation, and fouling and corrosion of plant equipment. As China and the rest of the world work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from parasitic load and urea-to-ammonia conversion may also become more important. If these challenges are properly addressed, SCR can reliably and effectively remove up to 90% of NOx emissions at coal-fired power plants. By the end of 2010, China had approximately 650 GW of coal-fired electric generating capacity producing almost 75% of the country's total electricity generation. As a result of the heavy reliance on coal for electricity generation, emissions of air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), are increasing. To address these growing emissions, the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) has introduced new NOx emission control policies to encourage the installation of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technologies on a large number of coalfired electric power plants. There is, however, limited experience with SCR in China. It is therefore useful to explore the lessons from the use of SCR technologies in other countries. This paper provides an overview of SCR technology performance at coal-fired electric power plants demonstrating emission removal rates between 65% and 92%. It also reviews the design and operational challenges that, if not addressed, can reduce the reliability, performance, and cost-effectiveness of SCR technologies. These challenges include heterogeneous flue gas conditions, catalyst degradation, ammonia slip, sulfur trioxide (SO3) formation, and fouling and corrosion of plant equipment. As China and the rest of the world work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from parasitic load and urea-to-ammonia conversion may also become more important. If these challenges are properly addressed, SCR can reliably and effectively remove up to 90% of NOx emissions at coal-fired power plants.
机构地区 School of Environment
出处 《Frontiers in Energy》 CSCD 2012年第1期98-105,共8页 能源前沿(英文版)
关键词 nitrogen oxides (NOx) COAL selective catalytic reduction (SCR) air pollution control nitrogen oxides (NOx), coal, selective catalytic reduction (SCR), air pollution control
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献53

  • 1NIU Yuwen1,2,HE Lingyan1,2,HU Min2,ZHANG Jing2 & ZHAO Yunliang2 1. Shenzhen Graduate School of Peking University,Shenzhen 518055,China,2. State Joint Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control,College of Environmental Sciences,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China.Pollution characteristics of atmospheric fine particles and their secondary components in the atmosphere of Shenzhen in summer and in winter[J].Science China Chemistry,2006,49(5):466-474. 被引量:13
  • 2杨东贞,于晓岚,李兴生,王超,Parungo F,Nagamoto C.临安大气污染本底站气溶胶特征分析[J].大气科学,1995,19(2):219-227. 被引量:14
  • 3Arimoto R, Duce R A, Savoie D L, Prospero J M, Talbot R, Cullen J D et al., 1996. Relationships among aerosol constituents from Asia and the North Pacific during PEM- West. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101:2011-2023.
  • 4Brown S G, Herckes P, Ashbaugh L, Hannigan M P, Kreidenweis S M, Collett Jr J L, 2002. Characterization of organic aerosol in Big Bend National Park, Texas. Atmospheric Environment, 36(38): 5807-5818.
  • 5Cao J J, Lee S C, Ho K F, Zou S C, Fung K, Li Yet al., 2004. Spatial and seasonal variations of atmospheric organic carbon and elemental carbon in Pearl River Delta Region, China. Atmospheric Environment, 38: 4447-4456.
  • 6Castro L M, Pio C A, Harrison R M, Smith D J T, 1999. Carbonaceous aerosol in urban and rural European atmospheres: estimation of secondary organic carbon concentrations. Atmospheric Environment, 33: 2771-2781.
  • 7Chen L W A, Chow J C, Doddridge B G, Dickerson R R, Ryan W F, Mueller P K, 2003. Analysis of a summertime PM2.5 and haze episode in the mid-Atlantic region. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 53: 946-956.
  • 8Cheung H C, Wang T, Baumann K, Guo H, 2005. Influence of regional pollution outflow on the concentrations of fine particulate matter and visibility in the coastal area of southern China. Atmospheric Environment, 39: 6463-6474.
  • 9Chow J C, Watson J G, Fujita E M, Lu Z, Lawson D R, 1994. Temporal and spatial variations of PM2.5 and PM10 aerosol in the southern California air quality study. Atmospheric Environment, 28: 3773-3785.
  • 10Chow J C, Watson J G, Lu Z, Lowenthal D H, Frazier C A, Solomom P A et al., 1996. Descriptive analysis of PM2.5 and PM10 at regionally representative locations during SJVAQS/AUSPEX. Atmospheric Environment, 30: 2079- 2112.

共引文献146

同被引文献153

引证文献13

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部