期刊文献+

影响宫颈液基细胞学高度鳞状上皮内病变诊断的因素分析 被引量:4

Accuracy of liquid-based cytology in diagnosis of high-grade squamous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨影响宫颈液基细胞学高度鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)诊断准确性的原因。方法收集2007至2010年间415例细胞学诊断为HSIL的病例,将细胞学结果与组织学结果对照分析,复查液基细胞学制片及组织学切片,分析误诊原因。结果共42209例受检者进行了ThinPrep液基细胞学检查,其中细胞学诊断为HSIL者415例,占筛查人群的1.0%。HSIL患者的平均年龄41.6岁,30~49岁为高发年龄。325例细胞学诊断为HSIL的病例其组织学诊断结果为:阴性/炎性改变23例(7.1%),宫颈上皮内病变(CIN)1级/人乳头状瘤病毒(HPV)感染22例(6.8%),CIN2级/CIN3级223例(68.6%),鳞状细胞癌(SCC)57例(17.5%)。细胞学HSIL对组织学CIN2级及以上病变的阳性预测值为86.2%(280/325),对组织学CIN1级以上病变的阳性预测值为92.9%(302/325)。细胞学假阳性的原因主要是组织学取材阴性、细胞学片中出现反应性腺上皮、孤岛状萎缩及放化疗反应等。细胞学诊断为HSIL而组织学诊断为SCC者57例(17.5%),误诊的原因主要为社会因素、对部分低分化SCC的细胞学表现认识不足,以及细胞学片中缺乏典型癌性特征。结论细胞学HSIL对宫颈CIN2级/CIN3级及SCC的阳性预测值较高,但存在与组织学诊断结果不符的情况,细胞学医师和妇科医师应注意避免造成不一致的因素。 Objective To investigate factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of cervical liquid- based cytology for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Methods A retrospective evaluation of cytological and histological slides was performed in 415 patients who had cytological HSIL between 2007 and 2010. Results Among 42 209 cases screened by ThinPrep liquid-based cytology, 415 cases ( 1.0% ) of HSIL were eventually identified. The mean age of HSIL patients was 41.6 years, and 30 -49 years were the most common age group. Among 415 cases, 325 patients had available histological diagnosis as follows: 23 (7. 1% ) negative, 22 (6. 8% ) CIN1/HPV, 223 (68.6%) CIN2/CIN3, and 57 ( 17.5% ) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The positive predictive values of HSIL to predict CIN2 (or higher grade of dysplasia) and CIN1 were 86. 2% (280/325) and 92. 9% ( 302/325 ), respectively. Inadequate biopsy, reactive glandular cells, islet atrophy, chemo/radiotherapy and others were responsible for the cytologically false-positive diagnosis. Fifty-seven (17.5%) cases of HStL had a histological diagnosis of SCC. The possible causes of misdiagnosis were social factors, under-recognized cytological features of poorly- differentiated SCC and absence of typical diagnostic features in cytology slides. Conclusions Cytology of HSIL has a high positive predictive value for the presence of CIN2/CIN3 and SCC. Cytologists and gynecologists should be aware of the diagnostic pitfalls that may lead to the discrepancy between cytology and histology.
出处 《中华病理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期265-268,共4页 Chinese Journal of Pathology
关键词 宫颈疾病 宫颈肿瘤 宫颈上皮内瘤样病变 细胞学技术 Uterine cervical diseases Uterine cervical neoplasms Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Cytological techniques
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Solomon D,Davey D,Kurman R. The 2001 Bethesda System:terminology for reporting rcsults of cervical cytology[J].Journal of the American Medical Association,2002,(16):2114-2119.doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2114.
  • 2Ost(o)r AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia:a critical review[J].International Journal of Gynecological Pathology,1993,(02):186-192.
  • 3Pradhan B,Pradhan SB,Mital VP. Correlation of PAP smear findings with clinical findings and cervical biopsy[J].Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ),2007,(04):461-467.
  • 4Robertson JH,Woodend B,Elliott H. Cytological changcs preceding cervical cancer[J].Journal of Clinical Pathology,1994,(03):278-279.doi:10.1136/jcp.47.3.278.
  • 5Grubisic G,Klarié P,Jokanovié L. Diagnostic approach for precancerous and early invasive cancerous lesions of the uterine cervix[J].Collegium Antropologicum,2009,(04):1431-1436.
  • 6曲玉清,周先荣,王丽,宁燕,徐婷,朱勤,王超,王新艳,车祺,张丽虹,王懿琴.TBS细胞学分类在宫颈液基细胞学检查中的应用[J].中华病理学杂志,2011,40(3):189-190. 被引量:19
  • 7杨斌.宫颈细胞学之国内外现状与几点意见[J].中华病理学杂志,2008,37(9):581-583. 被引量:13
  • 8张建民,杨幼萍,朱扬丽,陈璟.宫颈鳞状细胞癌癌前病变分类系统的进展和争议[J].中华病理学杂志,2007,36(3):206-208. 被引量:7
  • 9Tritz DM,Weeks JA,Spires SE. Etiologies for noncorrelating cervical cytologies and biopsies[J].American Journal of Clinical Pathology,1995,(05):594-597.
  • 10Bewtra C,Pathan M,Hashish H. Abnormal Pap smears with negative follow-up biopsies:improving cytohistologic correlations[J].Diagnostic Cytopathology,2003,(04):200-202.doi:10.1002/dc.10329.

二级参考文献40

  • 1Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin,2001, 51 ( 1 ) : 15-36.
  • 2Wingo PA, Cardinez CJ, Landis SH, et al. Long-term trends in cancer mortality in the United States, 1930-1998. Cancer, 2003, 97( 12 Suppl) :3133-3275.
  • 3de Cremoux P, Coste J, Sastre-Garau X, et al. Efficiency of the hybrid capture 2 HPV DNA test in cervical cancer screening. A study by the French Society of Clinical Cytology. Am J Clin Pathol, 2003, 120 (4) :492-499.
  • 4Castle PE, Sideri M, Jeronimo J, et al. Risk assessment to guide the prevention of cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2007, 197 (4) :356. e1-6.
  • 5Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Arm Intern Med, 2000, 132(10) :810-819.
  • 6Schiffman M, Solomon D. Findings to date from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study ( ALTS ). Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2003, 127 ( 8 ) : 946 -949.
  • 7Pan Q, Belinson JL, Li L, et al. A thin-layer, liquid-based pap test for mass screening in an area of China with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. A cross-sectional, comparative study. Acta Cytol, 2003, 47( 1 ) :45-50.
  • 8Belinson JL, Pan Q J, Biscotti C, et al. Primary screening with liquid-based cytology in an unscreened population in rural China, with an emphasis on reprocessing unsatisfactory samples. Acta Cytol, 2002, 46(3 ):470-474.
  • 9Nielsen ML. Cytopathology laboratory improvement programs of the College of American Pathologists: Laboratory Accreditation Program (CAP LAP) and Performance Improvement Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology (CAP PAP ). Arch Pathol Lab Med, 1997, 121 (3) :256-259.
  • 10Nielsen ML, Davey DD, Kline TS. Specimen adequacy evaluation in gynecologic cytopathology: current laboratory practice in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program and tentative guidelines for future practice. Diagn Cytopathol, 1993, 9 (4):394-403.

共引文献34

同被引文献32

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部