期刊文献+

胸腰椎二柱和三柱损伤短节段固定的稳定性比较 被引量:3

Biomechanic comparison of 2-column and 3-column thoracolumbar injury after short segmental fixation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过生物力学研究方法比较短节段固定对胸腰椎二柱(前中柱)损伤和三柱损伤的固定稳定性。方法选取8具新鲜家猪T13~L5节段的脊柱标本。实验标本需进行4种状态下的测试:正常状态(A);二柱损伤状态(B);二柱损伤短节段固定状态(C);三柱损伤短节段固定状态(D)。标本先采用自由落锤方法制成L2椎体的二柱(前中柱)损伤不稳模型;再在二柱损伤基础上破坏棘间,棘上韧带,黄韧带和小关节制备成严重不稳的三柱损伤模型固定。测试每种状态下的L1~3的活动度(ROM)和压缩刚度(Compressive Stiffness)并进行统计分析。结果在后伸,侧屈及旋转方向上三柱损伤组的ROM值均显著高于二柱损伤固定组(P〈0.05)。两柱损伤组在屈伸,侧屈,旋转方向的ROM均大于正常组(P〈0.05)。两柱损伤固定组与两柱损伤组相比在各方向上ROM显著减少(P〈0.05)。三柱损伤固定组和正常组相比前屈ROM(P=0.002)、侧屈ROM(P=0.001)显著增高。三柱损伤固定组压缩刚度显著低于两柱损伤固定组(P〈0.05)。三柱损伤固定组压缩刚度显著低于正常组(P〈0.05)。结论胸腰椎两柱损伤采用短节段固定能获得足够的稳定性,而三柱损伤采用短节段固定术后即刻稳定性和垂直抗压强度均明显较差。 Objective To compare biomechanical stability of 2-column and 3-column thoracolumbar injury after short segmental fixation.Methods Eight fresh frozen porcine thoracolumbar spine specimens(T13-L5) were collected,and divided to four groups: intact group(A),injury group(B),2-column injury fixation group(C),and 3-column injury fixation group(D).The stability of four groups at flexion,extension,lateral bending and axial rotation were measured respectively.Two-column injury model was created using dropping technique.For three-column injury model,The excision of supra-spinous ligament,inter-spinous ligament,ligamenta flava and zygapophysial joint was performed on the basis of two-column injury.Results The ROMs of group D at extension,lateral bending and rotation directions were signifcantly increased compared to that of group C(P0.05),as well ROM of group D at axial rotation increased signifcantly compared to that of group A(P0.05).The ROMs of group B at all directions increased significantly compared to group A(P0.05),and ROM of group C decreased significantly compared to group B(P0.05).The compression stiffness of group D decreased significantly compared to group C(P0.05),and that of group C decreased significantly compared to group B(P0.05).The compression stiffness of group D had no difference compared to group B(P0.05).Conclusions Compare to the three-column injury,the short-segment fixation is more suitable for keeping mechanic stability of the 2-column injury of thoracolumbar level.
出处 《中国临床解剖学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期225-228,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy
关键词 胸腰椎 损伤 生物力学 稳定性 Two-column injury Three-column injury Biomechanics Stability Compressive Stiffness
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Denis F.The three column spine and its significance in the classificationof acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries[J].Spine,1983,8(8):817-831.
  • 2Kallemeier PM,Beaubien BP,Buttermann GR,et al.In vitro analysis ofanterior and posterior fixation in an experimental unstable burst fracturemodel[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2008,21(3):216-224.
  • 3Wang XY,Dai LY,Xu HZ,et al.The load-sharing classi?cation ofthoracolumbar fractures:an in vitro biomechanical validation[J].Spine,2007,32(11):1214–1219.
  • 4王向阳,池永龙,徐华梓,林焱,黄其衫,毛方敏,李志龙.脊柱前中柱稳定性对椎弓根螺钉内固定器前屈压缩刚度的影响及其意义[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2003,18(9):614-616. 被引量:8
  • 5Lazaro BC,Deniz FE,Brasiliense LB,et al.Biomechanics of thoracicshort versus long fixation after 3-column injury:Laboratoryinvestigation[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2011,14(2):226–234.
  • 6朱旻宇,黄其杉,池永龙,吴立军,滕红林,王靖.对带横连杆的椎弓根钉固定胸腰段脊柱骨折(T11~L3)的稳定性评价[J].医用生物力学,2010,25(2):100-104. 被引量:9
  • 7Anekstein Y,Brosh T,Mirovsky Y.Intermediate screws in short segmentpedicular fixation for thoracic and lumbar fractures:a biomechanicalstudy[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20(1):72-77.
  • 8Yu SW,Fan KF,Tseng IC,et.al.Surgical outcomes of short-segmentfixation for thoracolumbar fracture dislocation[J].Chang Gung Med J,2002,25:253-259.
  • 9袁强,田伟,张贵林,刘波,行勇刚,李勤,胡临,李志宇.骨折椎垂直应力螺钉在胸腰椎骨折中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(4):217-222. 被引量:306
  • 10Mahar A,Kim C,Wedemeyer M,et al.Short-segment fixation of lumbarburst fractures using pedicle fixation at the level of the fracture[J].Spine,2007,32(14):1503–1507.

二级参考文献25

  • 1王新伟,陈德玉,鲍达,赵定麟,王以进.小牛胸腰椎解剖、生物力学研究及其临床意义[J].脊柱外科杂志,2003,1(4):223-225. 被引量:13
  • 2张春礼,王全平,王军,徐新智,陆裕朴.视频图像微机分析颈椎三维运动检测系统[J].医用生物力学,1993,8(4):220-225. 被引量:2
  • 3朱青安,胡庆茂,李慧友,钟世镇,李桂兰,黄文华,卢海俊,李忠华.脊柱三维运动分析系统及其在腰椎稳定性分析中的应用[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1995,5(4):153-156. 被引量:40
  • 4Panjabi MM. Biomechanical evelution of spinal fixation devices stability provided by eight intemal fixation devices [J]. Spine 1988,13:1134.
  • 5A Biomechanical Comparison of Calf Versus Cadaver Lumbar Spine Models [ J ]. Spine 2004,29 ( 11 ), E217-E220.
  • 6Zhu Q, Ouyang J, Lu W, et al. Traumatic instabilities of the cervical spine caused by high-speed axial compression in a human model. An in vitro biomechanical study [ J ]. Spine, 1999, 24 (5) :440-444.
  • 7Wilke H n J , Krischak S , Claes L. Biomechanical compression of calf and human spines [J]. J Orthop Res, 1996,14:500-503.
  • 8Robert H, Wemer H, Qi L. Mechanical Stiffness of Seg- mental Versus Nonsegmental Pedicle Screw Constructs: The Effect of Cross-Links [J]. Spine 2006,31 (2): E35- E38.
  • 9Lim TH, Eck JC, An HS, et al. Biomechanics of transfixation in pedicle screw instrumentation [ J ]. Spine 1996,21: 2224 -2229.
  • 10Lynn G, Mukherjee DP, Kruse RN, et al. Mechanical stability of thoracolumbar pedicle screw fixation., the effect of cross links [J]. Spine 1997,22:1568-1573.

共引文献319

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部