期刊文献+

中外科技奖励监督与保障机制的比较

The Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Supervision and Guarantee Mechanisms for Science and Technology Awards
下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍了我国科技奖励的监督机构与监督办法,阐述了国外科研诚信与学术监督体系,比较了中外科技奖励监督与保障机制的异同,向我国科技部门提出通过完善学术监督机制、建立学术诚信制度以保障科技奖励的公正与公平的建议。 This paper introduces the supervision institutions and supervision methods for science and technology awards in China, expounds the Scientific research integrity and academic supervision system in foreign countries, compares the differences and similarities between domestic and foreign supervision and guarantee mechanisms for science and technology awards, and puts forward some suggestions for China's science and technology departments on guaranteeing the fairness and equity of science and technology awards through perfecting academic supervision mechanism and establishing academic credit system.
作者 王凯宁
出处 《科技情报开发与经济》 2012年第6期124-126,共3页 Sci-Tech Information Development & Economy
基金 山西省软科学研究项目"中外科技奖励评审监督制度比较研究"(项目编号:2010041073)
关键词 科技奖励 监督机制 保障机制 学术不端 science and technology, award supervision mechanism guarantee mechanism academic misconduct
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

  • 142 C. F.R. Part 50. subpart A :August 8,1989.
  • 2National Science Foundation (1991) : Misconduct in Science and Engineering: Final Rule. Federal Register 56( May 14) :22286 - 22290.
  • 3Kenneth D. Pimple. Defining Misconduct in Science : Some Reflections on the American Experience, http://www. indiana. edu/poynter/tre4 - 2a. html
  • 4Kenneth J. Ryan. Report of Commission on Research Integrity: Integrity and Misconduct in Research. November 3, 1995, pages 2, 1. U. S. Department of Health and Human Service. Pulic Health Service. http ://ori. dhhs. gov/documents/report-commission. pdf.
  • 5Kenneth J. Ryan. Report of Commission on Research Integrity: Integrity and Misconduct in Research. November 3, 1995, pages 15. U. S. Department of Health and Human Service. Pulie Health Service. http ://ori. dhhs. gov/doeuments/report-eommission. pdf.
  • 6Kenneth J. Ryan. Report of Commission on Research Integrity: Integrity and Misconduct in Research. November 3, 1995, pages 15-17. U. S. Department of Health and Human Service. Pulie Health Service. http ://ori. dhhs. gov/doeuments/report-eommission. pdf.
  • 7Ralph A. Bradshaw. FASEB Letter to Donna Sha/a/a 7.2.96. http://www .faseb. org/opa/hhslet2. html( 1 of 3) 12/21/2005 11:27 : 16 AM
  • 8USDA Forest Service Research & Development. Code of Scientific Ethics. July 20, 2000, pages 9- 10.
  • 9The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Federal Policy on Research Misconduct. Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 235/ Wednesday, December 6, 2000/Notices, pages 76260.
  • 10The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Federal Policy on Research Misconduct. Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 235/ Wednesday, December 6, 2000/Notices, pages 76262.

共引文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部