摘要
科学证据是运用科学知识和科学方法对证据分析所得的判断意见。因此,科学证据属于意见性证言。为防止不可靠的科学证据对法庭的误导,英美法系国家建立了科学证据可采性规则,包括相关性规则、必要性规则、专家证人资格规则、排除规则、可靠性规则。美国科学证据可靠性规则经历了从Frye规则、Daubert规则到修订后的《联邦证据规则》702条的嬗变。我国对鉴定意见的审查主要限于相关性和合法性的审查。由于缺少对鉴定意见可靠性审查的指导与限制,导致了错误裁决的风险。本文提出确立鉴定意见科学可靠性规则的构想,以利于法官排除错误的鉴定意见,同时有助于法庭科学实验室的管理与制度完善,促使法庭科学实验室更严谨更科学地为法庭提供优质的法庭科学服务。
Scientific evidence is an expert opinion based on scientific knowledge and scientific methodolo- gy. In order to assist trial judges excluding unreliable scientific evidence which can misguide jurors or judges, the admissibility rules of scientific evidence have been established in common law countries, which include a rele- vance rule, a necessity rule, a qualified expert witness rule, an exclusion rule and a reliability rule. The reliability rules of the US include Fry test, Daubert test and the revised 702 rule of Federal Evidence Rule. Judges in China only examine the relevance and legality of expert opinion. The lack of judicial direction and restraints on the reli- ability examination of expert evidence creates a risk of wrong verdict. This paper propose that there should be the statutory rules for determining the reliability of expert evidence, which would help judges exclude sufficiently unreliable expert opinion and help forensic laboratories improve their administration and give courts excellent forensic science services more scientifically and scrupulously.
出处
《证据科学》
CSSCI
2012年第1期21-32,共12页
Evidence Science
关键词
科学证据
可采性规则
可靠性规则
审查认定
Scientific evidence, Admissibility rule, Reliability rule, Examination and determination
