期刊文献+

论冤案的救济机制 被引量:6

论冤案的救济机制
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在纠正冤案的意义十分重大。冤案纠正后的受益者首先是国家和社会,其次才是无辜者及其家属。国家应承担纠正冤案的首要责任。我们应当思考、呼吁、推动和营造一个有助于使冤案得以昭雪的制度空间。这种制度空间强调的是,以个人权利尤其是犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的权利为根本,靠制度本身的力量来纠正冤案,公开更多的冤案文本,鼓励学者们对其成因和预防等问题的研究,保护新闻媒体对冤案曝光和跟踪监督的权利。因此,需要建立冤案的救济途径,给冤案的平反昭雪以制度上的保障。在西方国家,要纠正错案总是存在很大的阻力,但是,总的说来,法治国家的伸冤机制明显优于中国。现有被告人上诉、申诉、检察院抗诉、法院主动提起再审昭雪冤案的方式之外,应当适时建立适合我国国情,能够主动发现冤案的纠错机制。 it is very important to correct unjust cases. The nation and society benefit most from correcting these unjust cases, then comes to the innocent and their relations. So the nation should take primary duty to correct unjust cases. We all should think about, appeal for, promote and establish a kind of mechanism which will be beneficial to correct unjust cases. On the base of the personal right of the suspect and the defendant, this kind of mechanism emphasizes correcting unjust cases by itself, making more files of the unjust cases public, encouraging scholars to study on the cause and precaution of these cases and protecting the right of the press for exposure and tracking supervision to unjust cases. Therefor, we need to establish the relief method, as a kind of mechanism, to protect the correcting unjust cases. In the west, there is hard resistance to correct unjust cases. Conclusively, however, this mechanism is more better in countries ruled by law than it in China. Besides the methods of defendants' appealing, appealing, the procuratorate' s protest and court at its own initiative, it is wise for us to establish a kind of mechanism to correct unjust cases, which is suitable to the situation of our county and can find unjust cases actively.
作者 王永杰
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《犯罪研究》 2012年第2期2-11,共10页 Chinese Criminology Review
关键词 冤案 救济机制 舆论监督 unjust cases relief mechanism supervision by public opinion
  • 相关文献

同被引文献64

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部