期刊文献+

Neural Networks Combined with Importance Sampling Techniques for Reliability Evaluation of Explosive Initiating Device 被引量:10

Neural Networks Combined with Importance Sampling Techniques for Reliability Evaluation of Explosive Initiating Device
原文传递
导出
摘要 Concerning the issue of high-dimensions and low-failure probabilities including implicit and highly nonlinear limit state function, reliability analysis based on the directional importance sampling in combination with the radial basis function (RBF) neural network is used, and the RBF neural network based on first-order reliability method (FORM) is to approximate the unknown implicit limit state functions and calculate the most probable point (MPP) with iterative algorithm. For good efficiency, based on the ideas that directional sampling reduces dimensionality and importance sampling focuses on the domain contributing to failure probability, the joint probability density function of importance sampling is constructed, and the sampling center is moved to MPP to ensure that more random sample points draw belong to the failure domain and the simulation efficiency is improved. Then the numerical example of initiating explosive devices for rocket booster explosive bolts demonstrates the applicability, versatility and accuracy of the approach compared with other reliability simulation algorithm. Concerning the issue of high-dimensions and low-failure probabilities including implicit and highly nonlinear limit state function, reliability analysis based on the directional importance sampling in combination with the radial basis function (RBF) neural network is used, and the RBF neural network based on first-order reliability method (FORM) is to approximate the unknown implicit limit state functions and calculate the most probable point (MPP) with iterative algorithm. For good efficiency, based on the ideas that directional sampling reduces dimensionality and importance sampling focuses on the domain contributing to failure probability, the joint probability density function of importance sampling is constructed, and the sampling center is moved to MPP to ensure that more random sample points draw belong to the failure domain and the simulation efficiency is improved. Then the numerical example of initiating explosive devices for rocket booster explosive bolts demonstrates the applicability, versatility and accuracy of the approach compared with other reliability simulation algorithm.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2012年第2期208-215,共8页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 National Level Project
关键词 neural networks importance sampling explosive initiating device RELIABILITY NONLINEARITY neural networks importance sampling explosive initiating device reliability nonlinearity
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Zhao Y G, Ono T. A general procedure for first/second-order reliability method (FORM/SORM). Structural Safety 1999; 21(2): 95-112.
  • 2Ditlevsen O, Madsen H O. Structural reliability methods. New York: Wiley, 1996.
  • 3Zhang H, Mullen R L, Muhanna R L. Interval Monte Carlo methods for structural reliability. Structural Safety 2010; 32(3): 183-190.
  • 4Melchers R E. Radial importance sampling for structural reliability. ASCE 1990; 116(1): 189-203.
  • 5Bucher C. Asymptotic sampling for high-dimensional reliability. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 2009; 24(4): 504-510.
  • 6Guan X L, Melchers R E. Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates. Structural Safety 2001; 23(4): 429-438.
  • 7Kim S H, Na S W. Response surface method using vector projected sampling points. Structural Safety 1997; 19(1): 3-19.
  • 8Gavin H P, Yau S C. High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis. Structural Safety 2008; 30(2): 162-179.
  • 9Deng J. Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis function network. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2006; 43(12): 3255-3291.
  • 10Schueremans L, van Gemert D. Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis. Structural Safety 2005; 27(3): 246-261.

同被引文献55

引证文献10

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部