摘要
近年来学术界有学者对马克思晚年是否提出了"跨越"设想提出质疑,虽然这对深化有关研究是有益的,但这种观点及其论据是值得商榷的。马克思对俄国社会发展道路的研究是持久而深入的,所得出的结论是他慎重思考的结果;马克思的"跨越"设想是他早先思想合乎逻辑的继续、深化和发展;从马克思与恩格斯有关思想的比较来看,他们的基本立场和基本观点是一致的;从国际学术界相关研究看,"跨越"设想引起了多国学者的关注,并非中国学者的理论虚构。
Some scholars have recently raised questions on whether Marx actually proposed the idea of 'bypassing' in his later years.Although the question may lead to further related studies,this view itself and its ground should be challenged.Marx's study on the road of Russian social development was long and profound,and his conclusion is the product of careful investigation.The bypass proposal is the continuation and development of the logical thought in his earlier stage.Through the comparison between Marx and Engel,we can see that their fundamental position and basic viewpoint are consistent.In terms of related studies at the international level,the proposal has attracted attention of scholars from many countries,and is not merely a theoretical fiction by Chinese scholars.
出处
《马克思主义研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期137-143,160,共7页
Studies on Marxism
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“《资本论》及其手稿再研究”(11JZD004)的阶段性成果
