期刊文献+

大学英语写作中同伴互评反馈模式测量评价表的编制 被引量:75

Developing the assessment tests for peer revision in College English academic writing
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究尝试编制英语记叙文与说明文写作任务的同伴互评反馈模式测量评价表,旨在为大学基础英语写作教学实施同伴互评反馈活动编制科学规范、简便易施的测量工具。研究结果表明,英语记叙文与说明文写作任务的同伴互评反馈模式测量评价表的信度、效度检验结果均达到了较为理想的心理测量学要求,测量评价表具有一定的聚合性、较好的内部一致性、可信性和跨时间稳定性;测量评价表能够区分同一英语写作水平团体内不同英语写作水平的个体,具有较好的区分作用和预测效度。 The present study attempts to develop the assessment tests of the English narrative and the English expository writing tasks.It aims to provide the scientific and easily handled assessment tools for college students to conduct peer revision in the English academic writing.It is found that the reliability coefficients of the English narrative and the English expository assessment tests are fairly acceptable,which meets the requirements for test compiling in psychological measurement;the items within the two sets of the assessment tests are highly correlated and exhibit better consistency and stability;both of the self-designed assessment tests present the predictive validity,which can effectively distinguish individual differences among the students with equal English writing proficiency.
作者 白丽茹
机构地区 天津外国语大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期184-192,220,共9页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目基金资助(09YJA740085)
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Teaching Press.
  • 2Ho, M. C. & S. J. Savignon. 2007. Face-to-face and computer mediated peer review in EFL writing [J]. CALICO Journal 2: 268-290.
  • 3Hu, G. & S. Lam. 2010. Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class [J]. Instructional Science 4: 371- 394.
  • 4Hughes, A. 2000. Testing for Language Teachers [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • 5Guardado, M. & L. Shi. 2007. ESL students experiences of online peer feedback [J]. Computers and Composition 24: 443- 461.
  • 6Keh, C. L. 1990. Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation [J]. ELT Journal 44: 294-304.
  • 7Liu, J. & J. G. Hansen. 2002. Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classroom [M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • 8Lundstroms, K. & W. Baker. 2009. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewers own writing [J]. Journal of Second Langtiage Writing 18: 30-43.
  • 9Mangelsdor, F. K. 1992. Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: what do the students think? EJ3. ELTJournal 3: 274-284.
  • 10Min, H. T. 2006. The effects of trained peer review on EFL students' revision types and writing quality EJ]. Journal of Second language Writing 2: 118-141.

二级参考文献144

共引文献2401

同被引文献657

引证文献75

二级引证文献612

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部