期刊文献+

腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统手术的对比研究 被引量:12

Comparison study of emergency laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术(IA)与开腹阑尾切除术(OA)的疗效。方法收集80例急性阑尾炎患者的临床资料进行回顾性研究,对两组患者术后病情的恢复进行比较分析。结果LA组肠功能恢复时间(15.1±7.2)d,住院时间(4.2±1.9)d,均明显短于OA组的(28.0±11.3)d,(5.5±3.2)d(均P〈0.05),术后并发症也少于OA组。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术具有恢复时间短、住院时间短和并发症发生率低等优点,具有较高的临床应用价值。 Objective To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy(LA) and open appendectomy (OA) in treating acute appendicitis. Methods The clinical data of eighty patients admitted with acute appendicitis given LA or OA were setrospectively studied and the recovery condition after LA or OA of the two groups were compared. Results Time of gastrointestinal functional recovery and hospital day of the LA group were obviously shorter than the OA group [ ( 15.1 ± 7.2) d vs (28.0 ± 11.3 ) d, (4. 2 ± 1.9) d vs (5.5 ± 3.2) d, all P 〈 0.05 ]. The rate of postoperative covaptications after LA was fewer too. Conclusion LA had advantases of faster function recovery ,shorter hospital day and fewer complications,which had higher clinical application value.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2012年第8期1176-1177,共2页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 腹腔镜 阑尾切除术 阑尾炎 Laparoscope Appendectomy Appendicitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献5

  • 1S. Olmi,S. Magnone,A. Bertolini,E. Croce. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: A randomized prospective study[J] 2005,Surgical Endoscopy(9):1193~1195
  • 2R. C. Ignacio,R. Burke,D. Spencer,C. Bissell,C. Dorsainvil,P. A. Lucha. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: What is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial[J] 2004,Surgical Endoscopy(2):334~337
  • 3G. Kazemier,G. R. de Zeeuw,J. F. Lange,W. C. J. Hop,H. J. Bonjer. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy[J] 1997,Surgical Endoscopy(4):336~340
  • 4E. Neugebauer,H. Troidl,C. K. Kum,E. Eypasch,M. Miserez,A. Paul. The E.A.E.S. Consensus development conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair[J] 1995,Surgical Endoscopy(5):550~563
  • 5刘允怡.腹腔镜检查在急腹症中的应用[J].中国实用外科杂志,2001,21(1):10-12. 被引量:80

共引文献43

同被引文献63

  • 1谢桂生,韦涌初.麦氏小切口阑尾切除术452例体会[J].微创医学,2007,2(5):420-422. 被引量:14
  • 2Arenas-Maxquez H, Hemandez-Zaiga JF, Barrera-Zepeda LM, et al. Chain of errors in laparoscopic appendectomy. Cir Cir, 2012, 80 ( 4 ) : 379 -384.
  • 3Sozutek A, Colak T, Dirlik M, et al. A Prospective randomized comparison of single-port laparoscopic procedure with open and standard 3-port laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of Acute appendicitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2013,23 (1) : 74-78.
  • 4Rashid A, Nazir S, Kakroo SM, et al. Laparoscopic interval appendectomy versus open interval appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled triM. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2013,23( 1 ) :93-96.
  • 5Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB, et al. Making the diagnosis of a- cute appendicitis:do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer nega- tive appendectomies? A 10-year study [ J ]. Radiology, 2010,254 (2) :460-468.
  • 6Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Tsang AW, et al. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicat- ed and complicated appendicitis [ J ]. Ann Surg,2011,254 (6) : 927 - 932.
  • 7Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy[J]. Endoscopy, 1983, 15 : 59 - 64.
  • 8Johansson B, Hallerback B, Glise H, et al, Laparoscopic suture clo- sure of perfortated peptic ulcer. A nonrandomized comparison with opern surgery[J]. Sueg Endose, 1996,10(6) :656 - 658.
  • 9Andrea Ciarrocchi, Gianfranco Amicueci. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in obese patients: A meta - analysis of prospective and retrospective studies[J ]. Journal of Minimal Ac- cess Surgery, 2014, (10) :4 - 9.
  • 10陈生,江汛,冯仲信.经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术51例报告[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2012,10,16(12):864-865.

引证文献12

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部