摘要
知识产权侵权行为领域应当适用何种归责原则:是过错归责原则抑或是无过错归责原则抑或是两者皆适用,何者为主?在我国,民事基本法及知识产权特别法都没有明确规定,在理论界尤其是司法实务界也存在着诸多分歧。本文从民事侵权一般归责原则及司法实践层面进行分析,考察TRIPS协议及不同国家的立法例并结合我国立法现状和实际国情,来考量知识产权侵权归责原则,以达统一适用。
Intellectual property infringement should be applied field what imputation principle： Is fault liability principles or no-fauh liability principles or both are mainly for what？ In the our country civil fundamental law and special law all intellectual property rights did not make clear a regulation, especially the judicial practice in theory, there are also many differences. This paper, from the general civil tort liability principles and the judicial practice level analysis, examine the TRIPS agreement and different countries and legislation according to our country＇ s legislation present situation and actual conditions, to think of intellectual property infringement liability principles, with a unified apply.
出处
《福建师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第3期48-54,61,共8页
Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金
福建省教育厅重点项目<海峡西岸经济区知识产权法律文化培育与发展>的研究成果(项目编号:JA11082S)
关键词
知识产权
归责原则
过错责任原则
无过错责任原则
Intellectual property, imputation, fault liability principle, no fault liability principle
