期刊文献+

人格特质的文化和性别差异——对岭南客家籍大学生与潮汕、广府籍大学生的对比研究 被引量:3

Cultural and Gender Differences in Personality:A Cross-cultural Comparative Study on Young People from Hakka and Other Guangdong Areas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究采用中国大五人格量表(CBF-PI)对1132名岭南三大民系青年进行人格特质的文化和性别差异研究,同时为岭南民系研究创建一个实证基础。结果表明,客家青年的同情心显著高于潮汕青年,热情因子低于潮汕青年,而客家青年的合群性、活跃程度、好奇心、冒险精神显著低于广府青年。同时,研究发现,三大民系的女性青年表现出焦虑、抑郁、敏感多疑、脆弱性、同情心以及愤怒-敌意的人格特质,而男性却表现出热情、活跃、冒险精神以及缺乏同情心。研究发现,三大民系青年只是在某些特质方面存在显著差异,并没有出现更多差异的人格特质,其主要原因在于共同儒家文化、文化融合以及青年教育一致。 In order to provide basic information about personality among Chaoshan population, Cantonese and Hakka in Guangdong Province and determine whether there are cultural and gender differences in their ways of personality, a China Big Five Personality (CBF- PI) was administered to 1134 subjects. The results indicated that compared to Chaoshan people, Hakka people had stronger compassion, while more activity, curiosity and spirit of adventure. The female tended to experience more anxiety, depression, sensitivity, suspicious character, vulnerability, compassion and anger - hostility personality. However, the male tended to experience more enthusiastic, active, adventurous spirit and less compassion. The study found that young people from three regions have significant differences in some personality traits. The main reason lies in the Confucian culture, cultural integration and the education of young people.
出处 《嘉应学院学报》 2012年第4期9-12,共4页 Journal of Jiaying University
关键词 人格特质 跨民系 客家青年 personality traits cross cultural Hakka youth
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献52

  • 1戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16~20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量:21
  • 2王登峰,方林,左衍涛.中国人人格的词汇研究[J].心理学报,1995,27(4):400-406. 被引量:75
  • 3陈伟明.区域传承与海外传扬——广府文化发展的历史与现实[J].中国发展,2007,7(1):89-92. 被引量:15
  • 4周积明 宋德金.中国社会史论[M].武汉:湖北教育出版社,2000..
  • 5[3]Marsella AJ, Dubanoski J, Hamada WC, Morse H. The measurement of personality across cultures: historical, conceptual, and methodological considerations [J]. Am. Behav. Sci,2000(44):6-41.
  • 6[4]Greenfield P. You can' t take it with you. Why ability assessments don't cross cultures [J]. Am. Psychol,1997(52):24-1115.
  • 7[5]McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Personality trait structure as a human universal [J]. Am. Psychol ,1997( 52 ) :16-509.
  • 8[6]Bock PK.Culture and personality revisited[J]. Am. Behav. Sci, 2000(44) :32-40.
  • 9[7]Van de Vliert E, Schwartz SH, Huismans SE, Hofstede G, Daan S.Temperature, cultural masculinity, and domestic political violence: a cross-national study [J]. J . Cross-Cult. Psychol ,1999 (30) : 291-314 .
  • 10John OP, Naumann LR, Soto CJ. Paradigm shift to the Integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual Issues. In John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA. Handbook of personality: Theory and research(3th). New York: The Guilford Press, 2008. 114-158.

共引文献181

同被引文献50

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部