期刊文献+

多维贫困测量的概念、方法和实证分析——基于我国9村调研数据的分析 被引量:22

Concept,approach and empirical analysis of multidimensional poverty measurement——A household analysis among 9 villages
下载PDF
导出
摘要 贫困的概念经历了由一元向多维度的扩展,传统单维度测量方法的局限性使得其无法解释贫困的现象,而多维方法有助于我们理解贫困的本质特性,包括复杂性、模糊性和渗透性等。在多维度贫困测量的框架下,简要回顾多维贫困测量的概念和方法,并利用A-F贫困双重识别方法对我国9个村的农户贫困状况进行了收入、教育、健康、住房和社会关系5个维度的测量。9村中3.3%的农户存在不少于4个维度以上的贫困,高于2010年我国的国家贫困发生率2.8%,而且农户在教育、健康、住房维度的平均多维贫困发生率要高,不同的村庄多维贫困发生率不同,其中四川云梯村和云南南美村的多维贫困发生率较高,平均多维贫困发生率都超过了20%。农村扶贫政策需要考虑到教育、健康和住房方面,使得贫困地区共享发展的成果。 The concept of poverty experienced the extension from unidimension to multidimension. The limitations of traditional unidimensional approach made it unable to understand the phenomenon of poverty, and multidimensional approach helped us to understand the essential characteristics of the poor, including the complexity, ambiguity and permeability. In this paper, taking the perspective of multidimensional,we briefly reviewed the concept and approach of muhidimensional poverty measurement, and measured the household poverty of 9 villages in the dimension of income, education, health and social relations by the Alkire-Foster dual cut-off approach. The results showed that 3.3% of 9 village households were of poverty at least four dimensions, higher than China's national poverty rate of 2.8% in 2010, and the average poverty rate of farmers in the education, health, housing dimensions was higher, the multidimensional poverty of different villages was heterogeneous, Yunti village in Sichuan and Nanmei village in Yunnan had a higher incidence of multidimensional poverty, the average incidence of multidimensional poverty were more than 20%. Rural poverty reduction policies need to take into account education, health and housing, and make the development more inclusive.
作者 李飞
出处 《广东农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期203-206,共4页 Guangdong Agricultural Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目(11CSH010)
关键词 多维贫困 交叉贫困 联合贫困 双重贫困线 multidimensional poverty intersection poverty union poverty dual cut-off
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1石俊.“贫困线”标准上调迫在眉睫[N].中华工商时报,2009-03-18(2).
  • 2郭松民.提高贫困标准体现“包容性发展”[N].人民日报(海外版),20l1-04-21(5).
  • 3Martin R.Are there lessons for Africa from China's success against poverty? [J].World Development,2008,37(2):303-313.
  • 4Caroline D.The muhidimensional measurement of poverty in Belgium and Britain: a categorical approach [J].Social Indicators Research,2004,68(3):331-369.
  • 5Robyn von M,Kevin D.Is poverty multidimensional? A compansion of income and asset based measures in five southern african countries[J].Social Indicators Research,2008,86(1):149-162.
  • 6王小林,Sabina Alkire.中国多维贫困测量:估计和政策含义[J].中国农村经济,2009(12):4-10. 被引量:528
  • 7沈红.扶贫传递与社区自组织[J].社会学研究,1997(5):32-41. 被引量:17
  • 8李佳路.农户多维度贫困测量——以S省30个国家扶贫开发工作重点县为例[J].财贸经济,2010,31(10):63-68. 被引量:55
  • 9菲利普·安东尼·奥哈拉著.政治经济学百科全书(下卷)[M].郭庆旺译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.2010.
  • 10Fusco.On the definition and measurement of poverty: The contribution of multidimensional analysis [A].3rd conference on the capability approach: from sustainable development to sustainable freedom[C]. University of Pavia,2003.

二级参考文献15

共引文献578

同被引文献256

引证文献22

二级引证文献181

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部