期刊文献+

非能动安全系统可靠性评估方法初步研究 被引量:7

Preliminary Investigation on Reliability Assessment of Passive Safety System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 非能动安全系统可靠性的分析是广泛采用非能动设计的新一代核电厂概率安全评价(PSA)的重要内容,其量化分析需根据非能动安全系统可靠性评估对象,确定影响系统运行的关键参数,结合事件序列对非能动系统进行研究。本文以AP1000非能动余热排出系统(PRHRS)设计阶段的可靠性研究为例,结合丧失主给水事故,根据燃料包壳完整性以及系统稳定性的功能准则,确定影响PRHRS的关键参数和设计参数。采用拉丁超立方抽样(LHS)确定输入参数组合,运用RELAP5/MOD3程序进行不确定性传递计算,进行关键参数对系统功能敏感性评价与确认,进行系统功能可靠性分析,为AP1000概率安全评价提供PRHRS可靠性估计。 The reliability evaluation of passive safety system plays an important part in probabilistie safety assessment (PSA) of nuclear power plant appling passive safety design, which depends quantitatively on reliabilities of passive safety system. According to the object of reliability assessment of passive safety system, relevant parameters are identified. Then passive system behavior during accident scenarios are studied. A practical example of this method is given for the case of reliability assessment of AP1000 pas- sive heat removal system in loss of normal feedwater accident. Key and design parameters of PRHRS are identified and functional failure criteria are established. Parameter combinations acquired by Latin hyper- cube sampling (LHS) in possible parametric ranges are input and calculations of uncertainty propagation through RELAPS/MOD3 code are carried out. Based on the calculations, sensitivity assessment on PRHRS functional criteria and reliability evaluation of the system are presented, which might provide fur- ther PSA with PRHR system reliability.
作者 黄昌蕃 匡波
出处 《核安全》 2012年第1期35-41,F0003,共8页 Nuclear Safety
关键词 非能动系统 非能动余热排出系统 可靠性评估 passive system passive residual heat removal system reliability assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1IAEA. Technical Feasibility and Reliability of a Passive Safety Systems for Nuclear Power Plants,TECDOC-920[M].1996.
  • 2D'AURIS F,GALASSI G M. Methodology for the Evaluation of the Reliability of Passive Systems[M].2000.
  • 3MICHEL MARQUES,PIGNATEL J F,SAIGNES P. Methodology for the Reliability Evaluation of a Passive System and its Integration into a Probabilistic Safety Assessment[J].Nuclear Engineering and Design,2005,(24):2612-2631.
  • 4玉宇;童节娟;刘涛.非能动系统可靠性分析方法探讨[A].
  • 5林诚格.非能动安全先进核电厂AP1000[M]北京:原子能出版社,2008.
  • 6Westinghouse. AP1000 Design Control Document[M].2008.
  • 7李明岩,彭敏俊,张志俭.非能动核电站主给水丧失事故仿真研究[J].原子能科学技术,2010,44(4):436-440. 被引量:5
  • 8张龙飞,张大发,王少明.压水堆核电站完全丧失给水引发的严重事故研究[J].原子能科学技术,2007,41(2):189-193. 被引量:5
  • 9The RELAP5 Code Development Team. RELAP5/MOD3 Code Mannual Volume[M].2001.
  • 10刘新宪;朱道立.选择与判断-AHP(层次分析法)决策[M]上海:上海科学普及出版社,1990.

二级参考文献8

  • 1沈瑾,江光明,唐钢.AP1000非能动安全系统初步应用研究[J].国外核动力,2006,27(1):1-6. 被引量:7
  • 2IAEA.Description of natural circulation and passive safety systems in water cooled nuclear power plants[R].Vienna:IAEA,2005.
  • 3IAEA.Natural circulation in watercooled nuclear power plants:Phenomena,models,and methodology for system reliability assessments[R].Vienna:IAEA,2006.
  • 4SCHULZ T L.Westinghouse AP1000 advanced passive plant[J].Nuclear Engineering and Design,2006,236(14-16):1 487-1 547.
  • 5ROBERTA F,ANDREA A,GUSTAVO C,et al.Design,experiments and RELAP5 code calculations for the perseo facility[J].Nuclear Engineering and Design,2005,235:1 201-1 214.
  • 6VIEROW K,LIAO Y,JOHNSON J,et al.Severe accident analysis of a PWR station blackout with the MELCOR,MAAP4 and SCDAP/RELAP5 codes[J].Nuclear Engineering and Design,2004,234:129-145.
  • 7Severe accident risks:An assessment for five US nuclear power plants,NUREG-1150[R].Idaho:USNRC,1990.
  • 8郎明刚,高祖瑛.严重事故分析程序[J].核动力工程,2002,23(2):46-50. 被引量:13

共引文献7

同被引文献46

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部