期刊文献+

A Comparative Study of Pollutant Removal Stability in Hybrid Wetland Columns

A Comparative Study of Pollutant Removal Stability in Hybrid Wetland Columns
原文传递
导出
摘要 This study investigated the effects of two alternative substrates(wood mulch and zeolite) on the performance of three laboratory-scale hybrid wetland systems that had identical system components and configurations.Each system consisted of a vertical flow(VF) wetland column,followed by a horizontal flow(HF) column and a vertical flow column.The substrates employed were wood mulch,gravel and zeolite,and Phragmites australis were planted in each column.The systems received synthetic wastewater,with pollutant loadings in the range of 8.5-38.0 g/(m2·d) total nitrogen(TN) and 4.0-46.4 g/(m2·d) biological oxygen demand(BOD5).Wood mulch and zeolite substrates showed higher efficiencies in terms of removing nitrogenous compounds and biodegradable organics.The supply of organic carbon from the organic mulch substrates enhanced denitrification,while adsorption of influent ammoniacal nitrogen(NH4-N) in zeolite played a major role in the removal of nitrogenous species in the wetland columns.Overall,the average percentage removals of TN and BOD5 reached >66% and >96% respectively,indicating stable performances by the hybrid wetland systems under the experimental loading ranges.Mathematical models were developed,based on the combination of Monod kinetics and continuously-stirred tank reactor(CSTR) flow patterns to describe the degradation of nitrogenous compounds.Predictions by the models closely matched the experimental data,indicating the validity and potential application of Monod kinetics in the modelling and design of treatment wetlands. This study investigated the effects of two alternative substrates (wood mulch and zeolite) on the perfor- mance of three laboratory-scale hybrid wetland systems that had identical system components and configurations. Each system consisted of a vertical flow (VF) wetland column, followed by a horizontal flow (HF) column and a ver- tical flow column. The substrates employed were wood mulch, gravel and zeolite, and Phragmites australis were planted in each column. The systems received synthetic wastewater, with pollutant loadings in the range of 8.5-38.0 g/(m:~ d) total nitrogen (TN) and 4.0-46.4 g/(m2~ d) biological oxygen demand (BODs). Wood mulch and zeolite sub- strates showed higher efficiencies in terms of removing nitrogenous compounds and biodegradable organics. The sup- ply of organic carbon from the organic mulch substrates enhanced denitrification, while adsorption of influent ammo- niacal nitrogen (NH4--N) in zeolite played a major role in the removal of nitrogenous species in the wetland col- umns. Overall, the average percentage removals of TN and BOD5 reached 〉66% and 〉96% respectively, indicating stable performances by the hybrid wetland systems under the experimental loading ranges. Mathematical models were developed, based on the combination of Monod kinetics and continuously-stirred tank reactor (CSTR) flow pat- terns to describe the degradation of nitrogenous compounds. Predictions by the models closely matched the experi- mental data, indicating the validity and potential application of Monod kinetics in the modelling and design of treat- ment wetlands.
出处 《湿地科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期142-148,共7页 Wetland Science
关键词 摘要 编辑部 编辑工作 读者 constructed wetlands denitrification Monod kinetics nitrification organic substrate performance stability
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献16

  • 1Arias C A,Del Bubba M,Brix H.2001.Phosphorus removal by sands for use as media in subsurface flow constructed reed beds[J].Water Res.,35:1 159-1 168.
  • 2Bavor H J,Roser D J.Adcock P W.1995.Challenges for the development of advanced constructed wetlands technology[J].Water Sci.Technol.,32(3):13-20.
  • 3Cooper P F,Job G D,Green M B,et al.1996.Reed Beds and Constructed Wetlands for Wastewatet Treatment[M].Swindon,UK:WRc Publications.
  • 4Gray S,Kinross J,Read P,et al.2000.The nutrient assimilative capacity of maerl as a substrate in constructed wetland systems for waste treatment[J].Water Res.,34:2 183-2 190.
  • 5Kadlec R H,Knight R L.1996.Treatment Wetlands[M].Boca Raton,USA:CRC Press.
  • 6Kozub D D.Liehr S K.1999.Assessing denitrification rate limiting factors in a constructed wetland receiving landfill leachate[J].Water Sci.Technol.,40(3):75-82.
  • 7Sakadevan K.Bavor H J.1998.Phosphate adsorption characteristics of soils,slags and zeolite to be used as substrates in constructed wetland systems[J].Water Res.,32:393-399.
  • 8Strous M,Fuerst J A,Kramer E H M,et al.1999.Missing lithotroph identified as new planctomycete[J].Nature,400:446-449.
  • 9Sun G,Gray K R,Biddlestone A J,et al.2003.Effect of effluent recirculation on the performance of a reed bed system treating agricultural wastewater[J].Process Biochem.,39:351-357.
  • 10Sun G,Zhao Y,Allen S,et al.2006.Generating‘tide'in pilotscale constructed wetlands to enhance agricultural wostewater trestment[J].Eng.Life Sci.,6:560-565.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部